Advertisement
Australia markets close in 24 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    8,028.50
    +16.40 (+0.20%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,786.00
    +16.60 (+0.21%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6663
    +0.0005 (+0.07%)
     
  • OIL

    82.34
    +0.17 (+0.21%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,377.50
    +8.50 (+0.36%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    96,907.91
    -1,247.63 (-1.27%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,352.76
    -29.90 (-2.16%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6216
    -0.0001 (-0.01%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0879
    +0.0006 (+0.06%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,682.39
    -89.42 (-0.76%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    19,752.30
    -156.56 (-0.79%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,272.46
    +67.35 (+0.82%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    39,134.76
    +299.90 (+0.77%)
     
  • DAX

    18,254.18
    +186.27 (+1.03%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,057.44
    -277.88 (-1.52%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,620.29
    -12.73 (-0.03%)
     

AlzChem Group AG (ETR:ACT) has caught the attention of institutional investors who hold a sizeable 45% stake

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies AlzChem Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • 53% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

To get a sense of who is truly in control of AlzChem Group AG (ETR:ACT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AlzChem Group.

View our latest analysis for AlzChem Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AlzChem Group?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AlzChem Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AlzChem Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

AlzChem Group is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that LIVIA Corporate Development SE is the largest shareholder with 25% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 13%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of AlzChem Group

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in AlzChem Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 28%, of the AlzChem Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand AlzChem Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that AlzChem Group is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.