Tax cut tactic delivers extra $41,000 for Aussie homeowners

Cash stock and and overhead picture of houses.
Negative gearing could be your answer to a sustainable tax cut. · Getty

Borrowing money to invest comes with some serious tax perks, where you can claim a tax deduction for the costs of borrowing money to grow your investments.

Borrowing to invest helps you invest more than you can with just your savings alone and cut your tax bill at the same time.

This is why negative gearing is one of my favourite tax-saving and wealth-building strategies.

What is negative gearing?

Gearing means borrowing to invest. The negative part refers to the ‘cash flow’ of your investment, with the most common form of negative gearing in Australia being investing in property.

Effectively, if you borrow to invest and the total costs of the investment are less than the income generated, the cash flow is negative.

Now you might be wondering why on earth anyone would want to choose an investment where they’re losing money, and it’s a good question.

There are two reasons. The first is the tax breaks, because the cost of your investment is able to be claimed as a full tax deduction (more on this below).

The second reason is that the income of your investment is only one part of the picture, the other is your growth.

Cost of owning an investment property

When you own an investment property, you receive income through rent and then have to cover the costs associated with owning the property.

The biggest cost is typically mortgage interest, then you have ongoing property expenses like rates, insurance, and maintenance.

I’ve included an example showing the costs of a $1 million investment property below, assuming you borrow the full amount of the purchase ($1 million).

Mortgage interest at 6 per cent = $60,000 p.a.

Ongoing property expenses at 1 per cent = $10,000

Total costs: $70,000 p.a.

You would then receive rent, and based on the Australian average of 3.7 per cent this would equate to $37,000 in rental income each year.

So the net cost of your $1 million investment property would be $33,000 (income of $37,000 less costs of $70,000). You can see in this case that the ‘cash flow’ of your investment property is negative, meaning you’d be in a negative gearing situation.

Property tax breaks and upside

If your income is above $45,000 p.a., your marginal tax rate + medicare levy is at least 34.5 per cent, which means for every dollar of tax deductions you have, you’d receive a tax refund of $0.345.

If your income and tax rate is higher, the tax deductions will be even higher.