Advertisement
Australia markets open in 8 hours 31 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    8,076.70
    +11.20 (+0.14%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6574
    -0.0026 (-0.40%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,804.50
    +11.20 (+0.14%)
     
  • OIL

    78.64
    +0.26 (+0.33%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,322.00
    -2.20 (-0.09%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    94,373.33
    -2,728.92 (-2.81%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,323.42
    +28.75 (+2.22%)
     

Why You Should Like Weibo Corporation’s (NASDAQ:WB) ROCE

Today we'll evaluate Weibo Corporation (NASDAQ:WB) to determine whether it could have potential as an investment idea. In particular, we'll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), as that can give us insight into how profitably the company is able to employ capital in its business.

First, we'll go over how we calculate ROCE. Next, we'll compare it to others in its industry. Finally, we'll look at how its current liabilities affect its ROCE.

What is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. Generally speaking a higher ROCE is better. Ultimately, it is a useful but imperfect metric. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since 'No two businesses are exactly alike.

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

The formula for calculating the return on capital employed is:

ADVERTISEMENT

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

Or for Weibo:

0.15 = US$598m ÷ (US$4.8b - US$801m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2019.)

Therefore, Weibo has an ROCE of 15%.

View our latest analysis for Weibo

Is Weibo's ROCE Good?

When making comparisons between similar businesses, investors may find ROCE useful. Using our data, we find that Weibo's ROCE is meaningfully better than the 9.1% average in the Interactive Media and Services industry. We would consider this a positive, as it suggests it is using capital more effectively than other similar companies. Regardless of where Weibo sits next to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms appears satisfactory, and this company could be worth a closer look.

You can click on the image below to see (in greater detail) how Weibo's past growth compares to other companies.

NasdaqGS:WB Past Revenue and Net Income April 28th 2020
NasdaqGS:WB Past Revenue and Net Income April 28th 2020

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be misleading for companies in cyclical industries, with returns looking impressive during the boom times, but very weak during the busts. ROCE is only a point-in-time measure. Future performance is what matters, and you can see analyst predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

What Are Current Liabilities, And How Do They Affect Weibo's ROCE?

Current liabilities include invoices, such as supplier payments, short-term debt, or a tax bill, that need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way the ROCE equation works, having large bills due in the near term can make it look as though a company has less capital employed, and thus a higher ROCE than usual. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

Weibo has current liabilities of US$801m and total assets of US$4.8b. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 17% of its total assets. Low current liabilities are not boosting the ROCE too much.

Our Take On Weibo's ROCE

Overall, Weibo has a decent ROCE and could be worthy of further research. Weibo shapes up well under this analysis, but it is far from the only business delivering excellent numbers . You might also want to check this free collection of companies delivering excellent earnings growth.

I will like Weibo better if I see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of growing companies with considerable, recent, insider buying.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.