Why being wealthy is different – and better – than being 'rich'
We keep hearing that the rich are getting richer, don’t we?
And it seems that COVID-19 made the gap even wider.
The world’s 10 richest people have seen their combined wealth increase by half a trillion dollars since the pandemic began.
Oxfam reports that in Australia 31 billionaires have seen their fortunes increase by nearly $85 billion since pandemic was declared.
Reading this made me think – what is wealth, and what is the difference between being rich and being wealthy?
- $500 lockdown payments: How to claim yours
- Stunned bar staff get $21,000 tip on $49 order
- Warren Buffett's top 8 lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic
Many years ago I remember first hearing Rich Dad Poor Dad author Robert Kiyosaki say:
“Many people think that being rich and being wealthy are the same thing. But there is a difference between the two: The rich have lots of money, but the wealthy don’t worry about money.”
What he was getting at was that while the rich might have lots of money, they also tend to have lots of expenses and money worries.
While they might have a high paying job, they still have to get up to work every day and as the current economic climate has shown too well, they may not have job security.
On the other hand, the wealthy don’t have these worries
Why? What’s the difference?
Well that all has to do with the definition of wealth that Robert Kiyosaki used.
His definition of wealth was the number of days you can survive without physically working, or anyone in your household actually working, yet still maintaining your standard of living.
For example, if your monthly expenses were $10,000 and you had $100,000 in savings or an offset account, your wealth is approximately 10 months or 300 days.
According to Kiyosaki, wealth is measured in time, not dollars.
In other words it’s not how much money you earn that’s important, but how much money you keep and how long that money works for you that makes a difference.
I’ve met many people who earn significant wages or make a lot of money in their business, but spend it all and have nothing left over at the end of the month.
Every time they make a little more money, they go shopping. They buy the latest smartphone or other “toys.”
Every time they get a wage rise, they spend more. They try to keep up with the Jones’ by taking a holiday, buying a new car or renovating their home.
The problem is they’re not building an incoming producing asset base.
So while they may be rich, they are not wealthy.
Now don’t get me wrong…
I like buying “things” just like everyone else.
I drive a nice car, own a number of expensive watches and take long holidays with my family.
But the big difference is that I don’t have to work or go into debt to acquire them.
Over the years, I have delayed gratification, spent less than I earned, invested my money and built a significant asset base of income producing properties which now provide me with a cash machine that delivers enough cash flow each month to cover my expenses—including my fun liabilities like cars, electronic gadgets and holidays.
In other words…I don’t work for my money. It works for me.
The bottom line…
We live in “the lucky country” – a place where many of us can become rich.
But only financially disciplined people can become wealthy, because it takes financial literacy, delayed gratification and years of strategic investing to grow a big enough asset base to build a cash machine to become wealthy.
As Warren Buffet said: “Wealth is the transfer of income form the impatient to the patient.”
Michael Yardney is a director of Metropole Property Strategists, which creates wealth for its clients through independent, unbiased property advice and advocacy. He is a best-selling author, one of Australia's leading experts in wealth creation through property and writes the Property Update blog.
Follow Yahoo Finance on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram and Twitter, and subscribe to the free Fully Briefed daily newsletter.