Advertisement
Australia markets close in 3 hours 12 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,906.20
    +56.80 (+0.72%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,639.50
    +52.50 (+0.69%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6576
    +0.0005 (+0.08%)
     
  • OIL

    79.07
    +0.12 (+0.15%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,310.00
    +0.40 (+0.02%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    90,593.53
    +3,271.75 (+3.75%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,283.74
    +13.00 (+1.02%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6124
    +0.0004 (+0.07%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.1022
    +0.0013 (+0.12%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,891.63
    +17.59 (+0.15%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,541.54
    +222.99 (+1.29%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,172.15
    +50.91 (+0.63%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    38,225.66
    +322.37 (+0.85%)
     
  • DAX

    17,896.50
    -35.67 (-0.20%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,365.84
    +158.71 (+0.87%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,236.07
    -37.98 (-0.10%)
     

While institutions own 18% of Marine Products Corporation (NYSE:MPX), private companies are its largest shareholders with 58% ownership

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Marine Products indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • LOR, Inc. owns 55% of the company

  • 10% of Marine Products is held by insiders

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Marine Products Corporation (NYSE:MPX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 58% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Meanwhile, institutions make up 18% of the company’s shareholders. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Marine Products.

Check out our latest analysis for Marine Products

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Marine Products?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Marine Products. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Marine Products' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Marine Products. LOR, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 55% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. With 4.4% and 3.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, RFA Management Company, LLC and Richard Hubbell are the second and third largest shareholders. Richard Hubbell, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board. Furthermore, CEO Ben Palmer is the owner of 1.4% of the company's shares.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of Marine Products

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Marine Products Corporation. Insiders own US$38m worth of shares in the US$377m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Marine Products. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 58%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Marine Products that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.