Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    6,678.70
    -81.90 (-1.21%)
     
  • ASX 200

    6,474.20
    -80.80 (-1.23%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6483
    -0.0021 (-0.32%)
     
  • OIL

    81.17
    -0.06 (-0.07%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,673.90
    +5.30 (+0.32%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    29,991.36
    -38.68 (-0.13%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    444.33
    -1.65 (-0.37%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6612
    -0.0004 (-0.06%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.1354
    +0.0014 (+0.12%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,065.71
    -134.33 (-1.20%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    11,164.78
    -329.05 (-2.86%)
     
  • FTSE

    6,881.59
    -123.80 (-1.77%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    29,225.61
    -458.13 (-1.54%)
     
  • DAX

    11,975.55
    -207.73 (-1.71%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,186.63
    +20.76 (+0.12%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    25,937.21
    -484.84 (-1.83%)
     

What Percentage Of Caravel Minerals Limited (ASX:CVV) Shares Do Insiders Own?

·4-min read

A look at the shareholders of Caravel Minerals Limited (ASX:CVV) can tell us which group is most powerful. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of AU$140m, Caravel Minerals is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Caravel Minerals.

Check out our latest analysis for Caravel Minerals

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Caravel Minerals?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Caravel Minerals. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Caravel Minerals' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Caravel Minerals. Paradice Investment Management Pty Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.9% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 4.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Stephen Abbott is the owner of 1.5% of the company's shares.

On studying our ownership data, we found that 22 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of Caravel Minerals

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Caravel Minerals Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$140m, and insiders have AU$20m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 59% stake in Caravel Minerals, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 15%, of the Caravel Minerals stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Caravel Minerals (including 2 which don't sit too well with us) .

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.