Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,837.40
    -100.10 (-1.26%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,575.90
    -107.10 (-1.39%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6546
    +0.0023 (+0.35%)
     
  • OIL

    84.04
    +0.47 (+0.56%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,351.90
    +9.40 (+0.40%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    98,316.67
    +1,611.12 (+1.67%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,329.11
    -67.42 (-4.83%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6108
    +0.0035 (+0.58%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0987
    +0.0030 (+0.27%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,805.09
    -141.34 (-1.18%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,654.48
    +223.98 (+1.28%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,122.13
    +43.27 (+0.54%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    38,249.43
    +163.63 (+0.43%)
     
  • DAX

    18,094.55
    +177.27 (+0.99%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,651.15
    +366.61 (+2.12%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     

Who Are The Major Shareholders Of Contact Energy Limited (NZSE:CEN)?

In this article, I will take a quick look at Contact Energy Limited’s (NZSE:CEN) recent ownership structure – an unconventional investing subject, but an important one. A company’s ownership structure is often linked to its share performance in both the long- and short-term. Since the effect of an active institutional investor with a similar ownership as a passive pension-fund can be vastly different on a company’s corporate governance and accountability of shareholders, investors should take a closer look at CEN’s shareholder registry.

See our latest analysis for Contact Energy

NZSE:CEN Ownership Summary August 12th 18
NZSE:CEN Ownership Summary August 12th 18

Institutional Ownership

CEN’s 32.05% institutional ownership seems enough to cause large share price movements in the case of significant share sell-off or acquisitions by institutions, particularly when there is a low level of public shares available on the market to trade. Although CEN has a high institutional ownership, such stock moves, in the short-term, are more commonly linked to a particular type of active institutional investors – hedge funds. In the case of CEN, investors need not worry about such volatility considering active hedge funds don’t have a significant stake. However, we should dig deeper into CEN’s ownership structure and find out how other key ownership classes can affect its investment profile.

Insider Ownership

Insiders form a group of important ownership types as they manage the company’s operations and decide the best use of capital. Insider ownership has been linked to better alignment between management and shareholders. CEN insiders may only hold a a minor stake in the company, but this is a relatively significant holding given it is a large-cap stock. A higher level of insider ownership has been linked to management executing on high-returning projects instead of expansion projects for the sake of apparent growth. I will also like to check what insiders have been doing recently with their holdings. Insider buying may be a sign of upbeat future expectations, however, selling doesn’t necessarily mean the opposite as insiders may be motivated by their personal financial needs.

NZSE:CEN Insider Trading August 12th 18
NZSE:CEN Insider Trading August 12th 18

General Public Ownership

A big stake of 67.74% in CEN is held by the general public. This size of ownership gives retail investors collective power in deciding on major policy decisions such as executive compensation, appointment of directors and acquisitions of businesses.

Private Company Ownership

Potential investors in CEN should also look at another important group of investors: private companies, with a stake of 0.054%, who are primarily invested because of strategic and capital gain interests. However, an ownership of this size may be relatively insignificant, meaning that these shareholders may not have the potential to influence CEN’s business strategy. Thus, investors not need worry too much about the consequences of these holdings.

Next Steps:

CEN’s considerably high level of institutional ownership calls for further analysis into its margin of safety. This is to avoid getting trapped in a sustained sell-off that is often observed in stocks with this level of institutional participation. However, ownership structure should not be the only focus of your research when constructing an investment thesis around CEN. Rather, you should be examining fundamental factors such as Contact Energy’s past track record and financial health. I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for CEN’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for CEN’s outlook.

  2. Past Track Record: Has CEN been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of CEN’s historicals for more clarity.

  3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.