Australia markets close in 6 hours 5 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,278.60
    +19.10 (+0.26%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,029.80
    +9.20 (+0.13%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6951
    -0.0016 (-0.23%)
     
  • OIL

    90.48
    -0.02 (-0.02%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,810.50
    -1.80 (-0.10%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    33,264.25
    -1,220.06 (-3.54%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    537.58
    -19.77 (-3.55%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6808
    -0.0007 (-0.10%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.1064
    -0.0006 (-0.06%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,724.16
    -29.32 (-0.25%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    13,008.17
    -151.00 (-1.15%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,488.15
    +5.78 (+0.08%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    32,774.41
    -58.13 (-0.18%)
     
  • DAX

    13,534.97
    -152.72 (-1.12%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    20,003.44
    -42.33 (-0.21%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    27,999.96
    0.00 (0.00%)
     

$112 per person: Govt would SAVE money by providing free RATs

·Personal Finance Editor
·2-min read
Prime Minister Scott Morrison with a surprised look on his face and a person removing $100 notes from a wallet.
The research suggests the Morrison Government would save $112 per person if it provided free tests for all. (Source: Getty)

The economic benefits of the Federal Government providing free rapid antigen tests (RATs) outweighs the cost of buying the tests, according to Flinders University.

The research comes after considerable public pressure on the Morrison Government over the past few weeks to provide at-home tests free.

The Prime Minister announced on Wednesday that Australians with a concession card would be able to receive 10 free tests over three months.

Flinders University found that providing free tests to 10,000 Australians would cost the Government $100,000.

However, they would be spending less on PCR tests (which are about $150 each), which then reduces the additional costs to the Government to around $52,000.

The research also found that allowing everyone free access to rapid antigen tests would result in successfully isolating an additional 464 people.

This would mean an additional 464 people that wouldn’t be spreading the virus to others, reducing the costs to the economy even further.

Close-up as a woman drips buffer solution from a plastic vial onto the lateral flow test device for Covid-19.
Rapid antigen tests have been in short supply accross the country and cases boom. (Source: Getty)

“The costs of these people isolating only after developing symptoms would likely be far higher than the extra $52,000 spent on tests,” Professor Jon Karnon, Professor Billie Bonevski and associate professor Hossein Afzali from Flinders University said.

“Dividing the $52,000 by the 464 earlier isolating cases gives us an estimate of the cost to the Government per additional earlier isolating person with COVID – $112.”

However, the research notes that the less COVID circulating, the less effective giving away free rapid antigen tests for all would be.

“But even with low prevalence, it’s still highly likely to be cost-effective,” Bonevski and Afzali said.

“Constraining the spread of COVID is important for many reasons, including avoiding short- and long-term health effects, reducing burden on the health system, and increasing availability of essential workers.

“Easy and equitable access to testing is a cornerstone of the public health response to COVID. It also makes economic sense.”

Follow Yahoo Finance on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram and Twitter, and subscribe to the free Fully Briefed daily newsletter.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting