Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,837.40
    -100.10 (-1.26%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,575.90
    -107.10 (-1.39%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6549
    +0.0026 (+0.39%)
     
  • OIL

    83.98
    +0.41 (+0.49%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,358.80
    +16.30 (+0.70%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    98,407.62
    +522.88 (+0.53%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,387.31
    -9.23 (-0.66%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6096
    +0.0023 (+0.38%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0979
    +0.0021 (+0.19%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,805.09
    -141.34 (-1.18%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,430.50
    -96.30 (-0.55%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,117.27
    +38.41 (+0.48%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    38,085.80
    -375.12 (-0.98%)
     
  • DAX

    18,028.67
    +111.39 (+0.62%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,675.82
    +391.28 (+2.26%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     

Is ClearView Wealth Limited (ASX:CVW) Popular Amongst Insiders?

The big shareholder groups in ClearView Wealth Limited (ASX:CVW) have power over the company. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

ClearView Wealth is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of AU$219m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about ClearView Wealth.

See our latest analysis for ClearView Wealth

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ClearView Wealth?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

ADVERTISEMENT

ClearView Wealth already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ClearView Wealth's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

ClearView Wealth is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Crescent Capital Partners Management Pty Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 47% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 16% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.8% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Simon Swanson is the owner of 2.5% of the company's shares.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of ClearView Wealth

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

I can report that insiders do own shares in ClearView Wealth Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$219m, and insiders have AU$14m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though I generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 13% ownership, the general public have some degree of sway over ClearView Wealth. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

With a stake of 47%, private equity firms could influence the ClearView Wealth board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 4.6% of ClearView Wealth. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ClearView Wealth better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with ClearView Wealth (at least 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.