Australia markets close in 4 hours 46 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,711.00
    +10.60 (+0.14%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,498.30
    +16.60 (+0.22%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.7063
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • OIL

    77.92
    +0.02 (+0.03%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,937.20
    -2.00 (-0.10%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    32,334.88
    -1,489.67 (-4.40%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    514.97
    -22.91 (-4.26%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6505
    +0.0012 (+0.18%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0910
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • NZX 50

    12,033.54
    -0.63 (-0.01%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    11,912.39
    -254.21 (-2.09%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,784.87
    +19.72 (+0.25%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    33,717.09
    -260.99 (-0.77%)
     
  • DAX

    15,126.08
    -23.95 (-0.16%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    22,069.73
    -619.17 (-2.73%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    27,444.81
    +11.41 (+0.04%)
     

With 52% ownership, SkyCity Entertainment Group Limited (NZSE:SKC) boasts of strong institutional backing

To get a sense of who is truly in control of SkyCity Entertainment Group Limited (NZSE:SKC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 52% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of SkyCity Entertainment Group.

View our latest analysis for SkyCity Entertainment Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SkyCity Entertainment Group?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that SkyCity Entertainment Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see SkyCity Entertainment Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in SkyCity Entertainment Group. Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Asset Management Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.7% and 7.3% of the stock.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of SkyCity Entertainment Group

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

We can see that insiders own shares in SkyCity Entertainment Group Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth NZ$22m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 8.7%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here