Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,837.40
    -100.10 (-1.26%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,575.90
    -107.10 (-1.39%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6547
    +0.0024 (+0.37%)
     
  • OIL

    84.03
    +0.46 (+0.55%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,350.70
    +8.20 (+0.35%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    98,274.63
    +148.10 (+0.15%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,391.37
    -5.17 (-0.37%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6099
    +0.0025 (+0.42%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0971
    +0.0013 (+0.12%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,805.09
    -141.34 (-1.18%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,430.50
    -96.30 (-0.55%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,078.86
    +38.48 (+0.48%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    38,085.80
    -375.12 (-0.98%)
     
  • DAX

    17,917.28
    -171.42 (-0.95%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,733.63
    +449.09 (+2.60%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     

UPDATE 1-Bank of America reaches $75 mln settlement over excessive fees

(Adds details about bank fees, attorney's fees, paragraphs 3, 7)

By Jonathan Stempel

May 14 (Reuters) - Bank of America Corp agreed to pay $75 million to settle a lawsuit accusing the second-largest U.S. bank of extracting overdraft fees it didn't earn from customers with savings and checking accounts, court papers showed.

A preliminary settlement of the proposed class action was filed on Wednesday with the federal court in Charlotte, North Carolina, where the bank is based, and requires a judge's approval.

Customers said Bank of America often charged multiple $35 fees for insufficient funds or overdrafts on a single transaction, sometimes reflecting the bank's repeated attempts to process it at a merchant's request.

ADVERTISEMENT

One woman said the bank charged her $105 after rejecting her $20 credit card payment and then attempting without her knowledge to "retry" processing the same payment five and nine days after the initial rejection, resulting in three $35 fees.

One woman said the bank imposed $105 in fees after rejecting her $20 credit card payment, attempting without her knowledge to "retry" processing the same payment five and nine days after the initial rejection, resulting in three $35 fees.

The plaintiffs' lawyers said that as part of the settlement, Bank of America will stop imposing multiple fees on "retry" payments for at least five years, saving customers an estimated $5.3 million a month and $318 million overall.

Bank of America denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. A spokesman declined to comment on Friday.

The plaintiffs' lawyers intend to seek up to $25 million from the settlement fund in attorney's fees.

Repeated overdrafts can result in account closures and leave some lower-income customers without access to banking services.

Banks have faced many lawsuits over the years claiming they sought to illegally maximize overdraft fees.

U.S. banks took in $11.68 billion of overdraft fees in 2019, according to the Center for Responsible Lending, even before the COVID-19 pandemic left millions in financial distress. Just 9% of account holders paid 84% of the fees, the nonprofit said.

The case is Morris et al v. Bank of America NA, U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina, No. 18-00157. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by David Gregorio and John Stonestreet)