Seabridge Gold Inc. (SRM.F)

15.27 +0.20 (+1.33%) As of 08:00AM CEST. Market open.

Seabridge Gold Inc.

106 Front Street East
4th Floor, Suite 400
Toronto, ON M5A 1E1
Canada
416 367 9292
https://www.seabridgegold.com

Sector(s): Basic Materials
Industry: Gold
Full-time employees: 

Key executives

Name	Title	Pay	Exercised	Year born
Mr. Rudi P. Fronk B.Sc., M.Sc.	Chairman & CEO	1.09M	N/A	1959
Mr. Ryan Christopher Hoel P.E.	COO & President	548.68k	N/A	N/A
Mr. Christopher Justin Reynolds B.A., CPA, CGA	VP of Finance & CFO	381.48k	N/A	1964
Mr. Charles Bruce Scott B.A.	Senior VP, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary	486.58k	N/A	1966
Mr. William E. Threlkeld B.Sc., M.Sc., P.Geo.	Senior Vice President of Exploration	437.82k	N/A	1955
Ms. Melanie R. Miller	VP, Chief Sustainability Officer & Director	220.32k	N/A	N/A
Ms. Julie Anne Rachynski	Vice President of Human Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
Mr. Robert Brent Murphy M.Sc.	Senior Vice President of Environmental Affairs	206.16k	N/A	N/A
Mr. Tracey D. Meintjes P.Eng.	Senior Vice President of Technical Services	N/A	N/A	N/A

Amounts are as of 31 December 2023, and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay includes salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in EUR.

Description

Seabridge Gold Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the acquisition and exploration of gold properties in North America. The company also explores for gold, copper, silver, and molybdenum deposits. The company was formerly known as Seabridge Resources Inc. and changed its name to Seabridge Gold Inc. in June 2002. Seabridge Gold Inc. was incorporated in 1979 and is based in Toronto, Canada.

Corporate governance

Seabridge Gold Inc.’s ISS governance QualityScore as of 1 October 2024 is 7. The pillar scores are Audit: 3; Board: 8; Shareholder rights: 7; Compensation: 5.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while 10 indicates higher governance risk.