RLF AgTech Ltd (RLF.AX)

0.0630 +0.0020 (+3.28%) At close: 10:06AM AEST

RLF AgTech Ltd

1/61 Dowd Street
Welshpool, WA 6106
Australia
61 8 9334 8700
https://www.rlfagtech.com

Sector(s): Basic Materials
Industry: Agricultural Inputs
Full-time employees: 

Key executives

Name	Title	Pay	Exercised	Year born
Mr. Kenneth Hancock	CEO (Global), MD & Director	258.7k	N/A	N/A
Ms. Su-Mei Sain	Chief Financial Officer	227.32k	N/A	N/A
Dr. Shen Lu Ph.D.	CEO of Asia & Director	522.72k	N/A	N/A
Mr. Gavin Neil Ball	Exec. Director	186.26k	N/A	N/A
Dr. Hooshang Nassery B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D.	Chief Scientist & Head of Plant Physiology	N/A	N/A	N/A
Dr. Carl Urbani B.Sc., Ph.D.	Chief Chemist & Head of R&D	N/A	N/A	N/A
Mr. Benjamin Patrick Donovan A.C.I.S., B.Com., B.Comm (Hons)	Company Sec.	N/A	N/A	1979

Amounts are as of 31 December 2023, and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay includes salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in AUD.

Description

RLF AgTech Ltd, through its subsidiary, RLF Carbon, formulates and sells crop nutrition products in Australia. It offers seed primers, soil and fertigation, and liquid foliar products that helps farmers grow food with higher nutritional value, while restoring soil quality. The company also develops Plant Proton Delivery Technology that enables farmers to grow higher yield and enhanced nutritious produce, as well as reduces atmospheric carbon. In addition, it explores for the commercialization of on-farm product technologies that enhances the ability to capture and store soil-based carbon. RLF AgTech Ltd was incorporated in 2017 and is based in Welshpool, Australia.

Corporate governance

RLF AgTech Ltd’s ISS governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while 10 indicates higher governance risk.