|Bid||45.10 x 900|
|Ask||46.39 x 800|
|Day's range||45.54 - 46.20|
|52-week range||33.12 - 68.00|
|Beta (3Y monthly)||0.96|
|PE ratio (TTM)||9.91|
|Earnings date||22 Nov 2019|
|Forward dividend & yield||1.52 (3.34%)|
|1y target est||47.26|
Retailers' performance over the last 2.5 months is a sign of positive market sentiment reentering the space. This sentiment will be tested next week when a wave of retail results hits the market.
Foot Locker (FL) possesses the right combination of the two key ingredients for a likely earnings beat in its upcoming report. Get prepared with the key expectations.
Foot Locker's (FL) third-quarter fiscal 2019 results are expected to reflect benefits from focus on digital business, supply-chain efficiency and international expansion.
Shoe Carnival's (SCVL) Q3 performance is likely to have gained from comps growth, backed by solid assortments and other efforts to boost store footfall.
Smucker's (SJM) Q2 results are likely to have been hurt by the U.S. baking business divestiture. However, the Ainsworth buyout is likely to have had a positive impact.
(Bloomberg) -- Nike Inc. is breaking up with Amazon.com Inc.The athletic brand will stop selling its sneakers and apparel directly on Amazon’s website, ending a pilot program that began in 2017.The split comes amid a massive overhaul of Nike’s retail strategy. It also follows the hiring of ex-EBay Inc. Chief Executive Officer John Donahoe as its next CEO -- a move that signaled the company is going even more aggressively after e-commerce sales, apparently without Amazon’s help.“As part of Nike’s focus on elevating consumer experiences through more direct, personal relationships, we have made the decision to complete our current pilot with Amazon Retail,” the company said in a statement. “We will continue to invest in strong, distinctive partnerships for Nike with other retailers and platforms to seamlessly serve our consumers globally.”Some big brands shun Amazon’s platform, where fakes flourish and unauthorized sellers undercut prices -- a recipe that diminishes the value of sought-after labels. The unraveling of the Nike arrangement threatens to reinforce retailers’ unease. Under the pilot program, Nike acted as a wholesaler to Amazon, rather than just letting third-party merchants hawk its products on the site.Amazon operates an online marketplace, essentially a digital mall where merchants can sell products. More than half of all goods sold on Amazon come from independent merchants who pay the Seattle-based company a commission on each sale. Amazon also operates as a traditional retailer, buying goods from wholesalers and selling them to customers.Nike said it will continue to use Amazon’s cloud-computing unit, Amazon Web Services, to power its apps and Nike.com services.Amazon, through a spokeswoman, declined to comment. The company has been preparing for the move, according to two people familiar with the matter. It has been recruiting third-party sellers with Nike products so that the merchandise is still widely available on the site, they said. Amazon has also been working to stem the flow of counterfeits on the site through various initiatives, including one project that lets brands put unique codes on their products to make it easier to identify fakes.Nike shares rose as much as 1.4% in New York trading Wednesday, while Amazon was off as much as 0.6%.‘Enormous Reach’The question now is whether other Amazon partners follow Nike’s lead. Few other brands possess the kind of muscle Nike has, so it may be harder for them to leave.“Nike has enormous reach and its products are in demand, so it can afford to be selective about where its products are distributed because customers will come find Nike where it is offered,” said Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData Retail. “I don’t think as many brands can be as selective as Nike.”For years, the only Nike products sold on Amazon were gray-market items -- and counterfeits -- sold by others. Nike had little control over how they were listed, what information about the product was available and whether the products were even real.That changed in 2017, when Nike joined Amazon’s brand registry program. Executives hoped the move would give them more control over Nike goods sold on the e-commerce site, more data on their customers and added power to remove fake Nike listings. The news of the Amazon tie-up, which Nike executives called a “small pilot,” sent shoe-retailer stocks tumbling and left many wondering if other major Amazon holdouts would quickly follow.But Nike reportedly struggled to control the Amazon marketplace. Third-party sellers whose listings were removed simply popped up under a different name. Plus, the official Nike products had fewer reviews, and therefore received worse positioning on the site.Leaving Amazon won’t necessarily solve Nike’s problems, which represent a big brand struggling to adapt to selling products in the digital age, said James Thomson, a former Amazon employee who now helps brands sell products online through Buy Box Experts.“Just because Nike walks away from Amazon doesn’t mean its products walk away from Amazon and doesn’t mean its brand problems disappear,” Thomson said. “Even if every single Nike product isn’t on Amazon, there will be enough of a selection that someone looking for Nike on Amazon will find something to buy.”Fewer PartnersShortly after its Amazon pilot began, Nike unveiled plans to overhaul its retail strategy. With more attention aimed at direct-to-consumer avenues, particularly the Nike app and Nike.com, executives said the company would drastically reduce the number of retailers it partnered with.In 2017, Nike did business with 30,000 retailers around the world. Elliott Hill, currently the company’s head of consumer and marketplace operations, told investors that year that Nike would focus its future efforts primarily on about 40 partners.Nike wasn’t specific on what would separate those 40 partners from what it called “undifferentiated retail.” Reading between the lines, it appeared to want partners that gave its Nike brand separate space -- such as Nordstrom Inc.’s “Nordstrom x Nike” shop on its website -- and was less interested in retailers that just placed Nike alongside its smaller competitors.The Wall Street Journal reported at the time that Amazon was one of those 40 that Nike intended to prioritize.Analysts said physical sporting-goods retailers would benefit from Nike’s departure from Amazon. The pilot program was an “overhang” to the stock valuation of Foot Locker Inc. that’s now removed, Raymond James analyst Matthew McClintock wrote in a note. Michael Baker of Nomura Instinet called Nike’s decision a modest positive for Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc.Foot Locker was down 0.4% at 9:51 a.m. Wednesday in New York trading, while Dick’s was up 0.6%.What Bloomberg Intelligence Says“Nike’s decision to end its wholesale pilot with Amazon.com is likely aimed at putting more focus on its own direct-to-consumer business, which is a key pillar of its Triple Double strategy. We still believe Nike’s goal for 33% of sales to be digital could be attained ahead of 2022.”\--Poonam Goyal, senior retail analystClick here to read the research.About 68% of Nike’s annual sales come from wholesale channels, down from 81% in 2013. Though wholesale is still the bulk of the company’s sales, in that span Nike’s direct business has grown three times faster than top-line revenue.Nike’s departure will rob Amazon’s brand registry program of a big name -- and potentially stoke the concerns of its partners. Nike’s participation had signaled that Amazon was taking the concerns of major brands seriously.Such brands have expressed frustration that Amazon doesn’t do enough to fight counterfeits. They also fear that giving Amazon too much control over prices will devalue their products.Amazon’s foray into private-label products has added to the fears. The company now sells everything from batteries to mattresses to snacks, further complicating the relationship between Amazon and brands.(Updates with shares in ninth paragraph, analyst comments in 21st paragraph.)\--With assistance from Robert Williams.To contact the reporters on this story: Eben Novy-Williams in New York at firstname.lastname@example.org;Spencer Soper in Seattle at email@example.comTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Nick Turner at firstname.lastname@example.org, ;Jillian Ward at email@example.com, John J. Edwards III, Cécile DauratFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
Softness in Gap's (GPS) namesake brand is likely to reflect in Q3 performance. Also, the company is grappling with dismal comps and strained margins.
Kohl's (KSS) third-quarter fiscal 2019 results are expected to reflect escalated costs. The company's efforts to boost store and e-commerce sales bode well.
Ross Stores' (ROST) fiscal third-quarter results likely to reflect benefits of initiatives, including better pricing strategy, merchandise endeavors, cost-containment and store-expansion plans.
Retailers are making prudent investments to strengthen digital ecosystem and delivery capabilities. While these drive sales, they entail high costs.
Canada Goose's (GOOS) second-quarter fiscal 2020 results are expected to reflect robust DTC business and healthy demand. However, high costs might have affected its performance.
TJX Companies' (TJX) performance in Q3 is likely to have gained from strong comps, fueled by prudent merchandising, store opening and e-commerce growth strategies.
Dean Foods (DF) is on track with cost productivity program, pricing actions and product innovations. However, softness in volumes and cost inflation is likely to have hurt the company's Q3 performance.
The traditional ways to plan for your retirement may mean income can no longer cover expenses post-employment. But what if there was another option that could provide a steady, reliable source of income in your nest egg years?
Growth in OCTAVIA products, launch of the new mobile platform, and pricing efforts are likely to have aided Medifast's (MED) third-quarter performance. However, rising costs might have been a drag.
Fossil's (FOSL) third-quarter 2019 results are expected to reflect impacts of currency headwinds and business exits. However, the New World Fossil plan bodes well.
Sally Beauty's (SBH) fourth-quarter fiscal 2019 results are expected to reflect impacts of the Transformation Plan and supply-chain efforts. However, soft SBS and BSG units are a concern.
Elevated tariff costs might have weighed on E.l.f Beauty's (ELF) Q2 performance. However, cost-saving efforts and loyalty programs are likely to have provided some cushion.
SKU rationalization and pricing initiatives along with foreign currency headwinds are likely to have impacted Hain Celestial's (HAIN) Q1 performance.
Softness in Baked Goods and Meal Solutions units is likely to have impacted TreeHouse Foods' (THS) Q3 performance. However, the company's focus on restructuring initiatives bodes well.