Australia markets closed

Facebook, Inc. (FB)

NasdaqGS - NasdaqGS Real-time price. Currency in USD
Add to watchlist
315.02-3.34 (-1.05%)
At close: 4:00PM EDT

314.67 -0.35 (-0.11%)
Pre-market: 8:50AM EDT

Full screen
Trade prices are not sourced from all markets
Previous close318.36
Open318.19
Bid315.12 x 800
Ask315.65 x 800
Day's range314.49 - 321.05
52-week range200.69 - 331.81
Volume15,577,605
Avg. volume19,865,234
Market cap893.227B
Beta (5Y monthly)1.30
PE ratio (TTM)26.99
EPS (TTM)11.67
Earnings date28 Jul 2021 - 02 Aug 2021
Forward dividend & yieldN/A (N/A)
Ex-dividend dateN/A
1y target est379.34
  • Editor's pick
    Yahoo Finance Video

    Despite possible backlash from Trump ban: 'Facebook will continue to have outsized impact on the market and society'

    Cory Johnson Money Manager and “Host of the Drill Down podcast, joined Yahoo Finance to discuss the day's market action.

  • Editor's pick
    Yahoo Finance Video

    Topic of misinformation will 'remain front and center' for Facebook: Analyst

    Facebook’s oversight board has upheld Trump’s ban. Wedbush Securities Equity Research VP Ygal Arounian joins Yahoo Finance Live to discuss.

  • How Mark Zuckerberg's attempt to sidestep decision on Trump ban backfired
    The Telegraph

    How Mark Zuckerberg's attempt to sidestep decision on Trump ban backfired

    Mark Zuckerberg never wanted the burden of having to ban a head of state. “I feel fundamentally uncomfortable sitting here in California in an office making content policy decisions for people around the world,” Facebook’s founder said in 2018, adding that he wanted a system in which “I am not the one making those decisions”. Zuckerberg’s solution was a novel one. Last year Facebook set up an oversight board, a quasi-judicial body funded by the social network but built to be independent. Nicknamed a “supreme court” for Facebook, the board would allow Zuckerberg to hand off the company’s most difficult decisions to a group of academics and human rights activists. But on Wednesday, its most high-profile case to date saw it return Facebook’s serve directly back to Zuckerberg. In a highly-anticipated ruling on the company’s January decision to indefinitely suspend Donald Trump from Facebook and Instagram, the oversight board found that Trump had indeed “severely violated” its rules. However, it demanded that Facebook revisit its decision within six months, and criticised the company’s handling of the matter.