Beijing Balance Medical Technology Co.,Ltd. (688198.SS)

135.68 -2.81 (-2.03%) At close: 03:00PM CST

Beijing Balance Medical Technology Co.,Ltd.

Science and Technology Park
No. 2, Huachang Road East District Changping District
Beijing 102200
China
86 10 6073 5920
https://www.balancemed.cn

Sector(s): Healthcare
Industry: Medical Devices
Full-time employees: 355

Key executives

Name	Title	Pay	Exercised	Year born
Dr. Lei Jin	Chairman & GM	N/A	N/A	1954
Ms. Qi Cheng	Financial Director	N/A	N/A	1968
Ms. Liyan Li	Deputy GM & Director	N/A	N/A	1980
Mr. Wuping Li	Deputy GM & Director	N/A	N/A	1978
Mr. Feng Liu	Board Sec.	N/A	N/A	1983

Amounts are as of , and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay includes salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in CNY.

Description

Beijing Balance Medical Technology Co.,Ltd. engages in the research and development, production, sale, and service of animal-derived implantable medical devices in China. The company offers artificial biological heart valves, bovine pericardial and porcine aortic valves; pulmonary valved conduit; tissue antigen removal processor, annuloplasty and valvuloplasty rings, and surgical biological patches; bovine pericardial valves, as well as pulmonary artery valved pipeline, outflow tract single flap patches, etc. Its products are used in heart valve replacement and repair, congenital heart disease implant intervention, and surgical soft tissue repair applications; and cardiothoracic surgery, neurosurgery, general surgery, and other surgical departments. The company was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in Beijing, China.

Corporate governance

Beijing Balance Medical Technology Co.,Ltd.’s ISS governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while 10 indicates higher governance risk.