Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    6,796.90
    +76.50 (+1.14%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6884
    +0.0066 (+0.97%)
     
  • ASX 200

    6,612.60
    +72.70 (+1.11%)
     
  • OIL

    108.09
    -0.34 (-0.31%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,807.40
    +5.90 (+0.33%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    28,185.61
    +330.93 (+1.19%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    418.11
    -2.03 (-0.48%)
     

NY Bitcoin Miners Start to Give Up on State Amid Regulatory Uncertainty

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·5-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Don't miss CoinDesk's Consensus 2022, the must-attend crypto & blockchain festival experience of the year in Austin, TX this June 9-12.

New York's bitcoin mining companies are increasingly considering abandoning their aspirations in what was once a promised land as the state's legislature considers a bill to ban new mining projects that use carbon-based energy sources pending a review of the industry's environmental impact.

The New York state Senate is looking at a bill calling for a two-year moratorium on new crypto mining projects that use gas, coal or other nonrenewable energy sources, after the Assembly version of the bill passed the state’s lower house last month.

“All cryptocurrency companies have a permanent hold on starting businesses in New York due to the political and regulatory ambiguity. If the bill were to pass, New York would become a permanent afterthought for the industry,” said Kyle Schneps, director of public policy at Foundry, one of the largest miners in the U.S., which is based in Rochester, N.Y. Foundry is owned by CoinDesk’s parent company, Digital Currency Group.

Foundry’s planned expansions in the state “will be curtailed along with hiring," Schneps said.

The bill, which passed to the state Senate in late April, calls for a moratorium on proof-of-work mining powered by nonrenewable sources, the type used in the Bitcoin network, in the state while its environmental impact is assessed.

Most crypto mining companies are staying away from the state because of authorities’ seemingly negative stance toward the industry, said Whit Gibbs, CEO of Compass Mining, a marketplace that matches miners with investors around the world.

Didar Bekbauov, co-founder of Kazakhstan-based miner Xive.io, who wants to expand operations into the U.S., told CoinDesk that he is leaning toward Texas because of favorable regulation and the availability of cheap electricity.

Prices are going up

Regulatory uncertainty, including the bill, is one reason why mining firms are less likely to move to New York, one executive from a local mining hosting firm told CoinDesk. Increases in energy prices are another reason. The executive attributed the uptick in electricity rates to global macro events such as the conflict in Ukraine as well as the growing cost of complying with renewable energy mandates in New York. The executive asked not to be identified, citing fear of retribution from environmental advocates and local officials.

This bill sends a “clear message to the crypto industry that New York is closed for business,” Schneps said. It “sets a dangerous precedent” and is a case of “government overreach” in that it limits a new industry’s right to energy, thus dooming the industry to failure, he said.

While the bill targets only mining operations that use fossil fuels, those that use renewable energy are wondering if they are next, John Olsen, who leads New York policy at advocacy group the Blockchain Association, told CoinDesk. The original language of the bill called for a moratorium on all types of mining, he said.

“Any kind of moratorium in statute is problematic because it can always be expanded or extended,” Olsen said.

Miners that Valkyrie Investments has spoken to think that “passing such regulations would likely cause them to reconsider New York going forward,” said Steven McClurg, the asset management firm’s chief investment officer. But “as the situation stands now,” renewable energy-powered mines don’t have “much reason” to move elsewhere, he said.

Read more: Can Crypto Miners Make the World Greener?

Coinmint, which operates a bitcoin mine with 435 megawatts of power capacity at a former aluminum smelter in Massena, N.Y., refused to comment on the bill specifically. But CEO David Fogel said its New York subsidiary operates “in an environmentally responsible way by using renewable hydroelectric power."

New York’s flip flop

Investments in mining in New York predate the exodus of miners from China, and the state is now at the epicenter of a debate about how to regulate miners in the U.S.

The state is rich in hydroelectric power; 80% of the electricity produced by the New York Power Authority (NYPA) comes from hydro, Alex Chiaravalle, associate media relations specialist at NYPA, told CoinDesk via email on Thursday. But NYPA generates only a quarter of the state's energy, according to its website. New York also boasts some of the cheapest electricity prices for businesses in the northeastern U.S.

Read more: After Short-Lived Ban, City in Upstate NY Is Still Reckoning With Crypto Miners

Environmental concerns have followed the crypto miners, with one mine in particular the target of environmentalists’ ire: the Greenidge mine near Seneca Lake in upstate New York. It’s a 1937 coal power plant that was converted into a natural gas facility in 2014 and now houses 19,400 bitcoin mining rigs, with plans to add another 29,800 machines by the end of the year.

Environmentalists claim the mine is polluting the lake and jeopardizes the state’s carbon emissions goals. They have asked authorities and the government to deny renewal of the plant’s air pollution permits. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation put off a decision on the issue until June 30, just two days after the primaries are scheduled to be held to nominate candidates for governor, while the state Supreme Court denied a preliminary injunction that would have stopped the mine’s operations before a decision is made.

In December of last year, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, asked the company to provide information about its carbon footprint, saying that “mining operations at Greenidge and other plants raise concerns about their impacts on the global environment, on local ecosystems and on consumer electricity costs.” Another letter to six miners around the U.S. followed a month later.

Read more: Environmental Groups Call on US Government to Implement Stringent Bitcoin Mining Regulations

UPDATE (May 19, 3:00 p.m. UTC): Clarifies New York electricity generation figures.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting