Advertisement
Australia markets close in 5 hours 9 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    8,245.40
    +53.50 (+0.65%)
     
  • ASX 200

    8,041.90
    +53.80 (+0.67%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6652
    -0.0012 (-0.18%)
     
  • OIL

    68.80
    +0.09 (+0.13%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,534.10
    +1.40 (+0.06%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    85,712.68
    +2,811.23 (+3.39%)
     
  • XRP AUD

    0.81
    +0.01 (+1.36%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6028
    -0.0006 (-0.10%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0843
    +0.0008 (+0.08%)
     
  • NZX 50

    12,661.31
    +39.69 (+0.31%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    18,660.78
    +239.47 (+1.30%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,270.84
    +89.37 (+1.09%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    40,829.59
    +484.18 (+1.20%)
     
  • DAX

    18,443.56
    +141.66 (+0.77%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,196.96
    -247.34 (-1.42%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    36,231.30
    +15.55 (+0.04%)
     

Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE:WM) is favoured by institutional owners who hold 83% of the company

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Waste Management's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company

  • Insiders have been selling lately

A look at the shareholders of Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE:WM) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 83% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Waste Management, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Waste Management

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Waste Management?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

Waste Management already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Waste Management's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Waste Management. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.0%. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust is the second largest shareholder owning 8.8% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.2% of the company stock.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 25 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Waste Management

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Waste Management, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$151m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Waste Management. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Waste Management that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com