Advertisement
Australia markets close in 53 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,859.80
    -149.60 (-1.87%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,610.10
    -142.40 (-1.84%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6427
    -0.0018 (-0.28%)
     
  • OIL

    85.99
    +0.58 (+0.68%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,404.80
    +21.80 (+0.91%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    97,456.10
    -3,785.94 (-3.74%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6052
    -0.0007 (-0.12%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0907
    -0.0002 (-0.01%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,799.67
    -117.11 (-0.98%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,706.83
    -296.65 (-1.65%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,965.53
    -30.05 (-0.38%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    37,735.11
    -248.13 (-0.65%)
     
  • DAX

    18,026.58
    +96.26 (+0.54%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,303.27
    -297.19 (-1.79%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,407.15
    -825.65 (-2.10%)
     

UBS pays $1.7 mn for 'apparent' sanctions violations

Switzerland's long-sacrosanct banking secrecy laws in the past made it impossible for countries to file such broad requests for account information

Swiss bank UBS has agreed to pay US authorities $1.7 million to settle "apparent" violations of rules banning transactions benefiting officially designated terrorists, the Treasury Department said Thursday.

The Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control said the bank had handled 222 US securities transactions worth $2.5 million between 2008 and 2013 on behalf of an individual client who was blacklisted by OFAC under US sanctions.

The client was not identified by the Treasury, but it said the transactions benefited a person or group named by the United States as a "specially designated global terrorist."

The Treasury said that although a number of people in UBS's compliance department knew of the client's OFAC designation, "the bank failed to implement any steps or measures to prevent UBS from processing transactions for the client to or through the United States."

ADVERTISEMENT

The UBS settlement agreement with OFAC labeled the transactions "apparent" because UBS at the time had considered them internal to the bank and so not in violation of US rules.

OFAC credited UBS with generally adhering closely to sanctions rules, with "substantially" cooperating in the investigation, and for having taken remedial action after the problem surfaced.

The penalty paid was much less than the base possible penalty in the case of $3.78 million.