Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    6,990.60
    -42.90 (-0.61%)
     
  • ASX 200

    6,778.40
    -39.10 (-0.57%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6412
    -0.0003 (-0.05%)
     
  • OIL

    88.28
    -0.17 (-0.19%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,718.30
    -2.50 (-0.15%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    31,111.87
    -794.32 (-2.49%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    453.96
    -9.16 (-1.98%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6542
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.1334
    +0.0016 (+0.14%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,103.79
    -21.41 (-0.19%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    11,485.50
    -87.70 (-0.76%)
     
  • FTSE

    6,997.27
    -55.35 (-0.78%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    29,926.94
    -346.96 (-1.15%)
     
  • DAX

    12,470.78
    -46.42 (-0.37%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,809.40
    -202.75 (-1.13%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    27,099.55
    -211.75 (-0.78%)
     

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of Northern Minerals Limited (ASX:NTU) Shares?

·4-min read

If you want to know who really controls Northern Minerals Limited (ASX:NTU), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

With a market capitalization of AU$190m, Northern Minerals is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions don't own many shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Northern Minerals.

Check out our latest analysis for Northern Minerals

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Northern Minerals?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Institutions have a very small stake in Northern Minerals. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Northern Minerals. Yuxiao Fund Pte Ltd is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10.0% of shares outstanding. Vastness Investment Group Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 7.7% of common stock, and Yongquan He holds about 5.1% of the company stock.

Our studies suggest that the top 19 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

Insider Ownership Of Northern Minerals

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Northern Minerals Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$190m, and insiders have AU$45m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 44% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 26%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Northern Minerals you should be aware of, and 2 of them are concerning.

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here