Advertisement
Australia markets close in 4 hours 12 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    8,033.70
    +30.90 (+0.39%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,791.60
    +32.00 (+0.41%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6628
    -0.0023 (-0.35%)
     
  • OIL

    82.10
    +0.36 (+0.44%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,330.70
    -5.90 (-0.25%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    93,583.23
    +1,437.77 (+1.56%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,293.44
    +27.29 (+2.16%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6195
    -0.0011 (-0.18%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0926
    -0.0001 (-0.01%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,717.43
    -117.59 (-0.99%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    19,789.03
    +37.98 (+0.19%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,179.68
    -45.65 (-0.55%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    39,164.06
    +36.26 (+0.09%)
     
  • DAX

    18,210.55
    +55.31 (+0.30%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,696.64
    -19.83 (-0.11%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,737.77
    +396.23 (+1.01%)
     

Telos Corporation's (NASDAQ:TLS) institutional investors lost 18% last week but have benefitted from longer-term gains

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Telos' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership

  • Insiders have bought recently

If you want to know who really controls Telos Corporation (NASDAQ:TLS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 61% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$274m last week. However, the 45% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Telos.

See our latest analysis for Telos

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Telos?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

Telos already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Telos' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Telos. Our data shows that Barclays PLC Private Banking & Investment Banking Investment is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 8.1% of the stock. John Wood, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Telos

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Telos Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$274m, and insiders have US$40m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Telos. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 13%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Telos (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com