Australia Markets closed

Staffers at The Weinstein Company release a statement calling Harvey a 'serial sexual predator'

Jason Guerrasio
Harvey weinstein
  • The Weinstein Company staff are "angry" and "baffled" by the behaviour of cofounder Harvey Weinstein.
  • TWC staff are in breach of their non-disclosure agreements by speaking out.
  • TWC staff want the company to be "radically transparent" going forward.

On Thursday staff members of The Weinstein Company released a statement saying the alleged decades-long sexual harassment and abuse of women by its cofounder, Harvey Weinstein, has made them "angry" and "baffled."

"We all knew that we were working for a man with an infamous temper. We did not know we were working for a serial sexual predator," the statement read. "We knew that our boss could be manipulative. We did not know that he used his power to systematically assault and silence women. We had an idea that he was a womanizer who had extra-marital affairs. We did not know he was a violent aggressor and alleged rapist."

The Weinstein Company board fired Weinstein on October 8 following an explosive story in The New York Times that alleged the movie executive had sexually harassed women in Hollywood for at least three decades. The following week, a New Yorker story revealed more alleged sexual misconduct, including alleged assault, by Weinstein.

The TWC staff statement also points out that the staffers are aware that by releasing this statement they are in breach of the non-disclosure agreement in their contracts, but that their former boss is in violation of his contract with his employees by not creating a safe work environment.

"We have nothing to hide, and are as angry and baffled as you are at how Harvey's behaviour could continue for so long. We ask that the company let us out of our NDAs immediately -- and do the same for all former Weinstein Company employees -- so we may speak openly, and get to the origins of what happened here, and how," the statement read.

"We unequivocally support all the women who have come forward, many of whom we count among our own friends and colleagues," the statement went on to read. "Thank you for speaking out. When the New York Times and The New Yorker articles broke, we wept. We see you, we admire you, and we are in this fight alongside you."

The staff now believe that the only way to go forward with the company is to be "radically transparent."

"And for that to happen, anyone who had specific knowledge of non-consensual, predatory behaviour must go. That is the only way anyone will feel comfortable working with us. It is the only way any of us will feel comfortable working here."

Read the entire TWC statement below:

"We came to work at this company because we love movies. We grew up watching Miramax films, and came to associate that name, and later the name Weinstein, with great storytelling.

Some of us have been here for years, others for just for a few months. Some have been here since their first college internship, others joined the team after a rigorous application process. All of us were excited to get the job, proud to be working for a company with such an illustrious history.

We all knew that we were working for a man with an infamous temper. We did not know we were working for a serial sexual predator. We knew that our boss could be manipulative. We did not know that he used his power to systematically assault and silence women. We had an idea that he was a womanizer who had extra-marital affairs. We did not know he was a violent aggressor and alleged rapist.

But to say that we are shocked and surprised only makes us part of the problem.

Our company was built on Harvey's unbridled ambition -- his aggressive deal making, his insatiable desire to win and get what he wanted, his unabashed love for celebrity -- these traits were legendary, and the art they produced made an indelible mark on the entertainment industry.

But we now know that behind closed doors, these were the same traits that made him a monster. He created a toxic ecosystem where his abuse could flourish unchecked for decades.

We know that in writing this we are in open breach of the non-disclosure agreements in our contracts. But our former boss is in open violation of his contract with us -- the employees -- to create a safe place for us to work.

We have nothing to hide, and are as angry and baffled as you are at how Harvey's behaviour could continue for so long. We ask that the company let us out of our NDAs immediately -- and do the same for all former Weinstein Company employees -- so we may speak openly, and get to the origins of what happened here, and how.

We unequivocally support all the women who have come forward, many of whom we count among our own friends and colleagues. Thank you for speaking out. When the New York Times and The New Yorker articles broke, we wept. We see you, we admire you, and we are in this fight alongside you.

And while we can only speak for the people represented in this statement, none of us ever knowingly acted as a so-called "honeypot". That is disgusting and renders us all victims of Harvey's disgraceful behaviour.

Practically none of us have ever met the board. Aside from Bob Weinstein, few of us even knew their names before last week. If the board's job was to keep Harvey in check, financially and otherwise, they failed.

As we begin the painful process of reflecting on our industry and the ugly systems we've wrought and let thrive, we are asking ourselves the question: how do we define abuse? Do we include verbal degradation, ruthless aggression and physical intimidation? This particular horror show centres on a sexual predator who abused his power in a very specific way. But if we're being honest (and if not now, when?) we all know that threatening, hostile, inhumane work environments are rampant in our industry.

Non-disclosure agreements only perpetuate this culture of silence. The "if you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen" mentality undermines those who might've spoken out. We treat these abusive people and places as rites of passage, instead of with the disgust they deserve.

Harvey Weinstein is far from the only sociopathic bully we've exalted over the years. Employees who work under our industry's most notorious bosses are regularly asked to surrender their dignity in exchange for professional success.

So now that Harvey is gone, what next? If there is a future for this company, it must be one of radical transparency and accountability. And for that to happen, anyone who had specific knowledge of non-consensual, predatory behaviour must go. That is the only way anyone will feel comfortable working with us. It is the only way any of us will feel comfortable working here.

To those speaking out, and to those fearlessly reporting: we are so grateful for your courage. Right now, we want to listen hard and keep listening, no matter how unsettling or overwhelming these stories are. But after that we must start to ask hard questions of our industry, so we may do right not only by Harvey's many victims, but also by young film lovers who, like all of us, just want to work in movies."