Shares in agricultural REIT Rural Funds Group (ASX: RFF) are down 19 per cent over the last six months as it struggles to shake off allegations of a conflicted management structure by short sellers.
On November 21 Hong Kong-based short selling research house Bucephalus took aim again at the management structure where Rural Funds Management (RFM) acts as responsible entity (RE) on behalf of the listed RFF investors.
Bucephalus also took aim at RFF’s plan to sell its poultry assets. Bucephalus claims RFF underinvested in them for many years to the point where they’re now no longer profitable.
Bucephalus claims the decision to sell is because it wants to strips out the cash to maintain dividends, etc, while the actual value of the RFF unit holders’ assets is being slowly run down.
Rural Funds has dismissed these allegations as nonsense.
Rural Funds Management has also repeatedly dismissed the allegations that it’s using cash and equity raisings to prop up the dividends paid by RFF to its unitholders.
It has also rubbished allegations that it’s running RFF to enrich RFM management due to a remuneration structure that includes RFM’s fees being based on RFF’s net asset values.
It even went as far as paying auditor Deloitte to look into a number of allegations from original short seller Bonitas Research and dismiss them all as unfounded.
The decision to not comment on Bonitas’s allegations and instead point investors to the ‘audit assurance’ and commission a separate Deloitte report was unusual.
Investors are free to draw their own conclusions as to why Rural Fund’s management went for this “Fifth Amendment” no comment type approach.
If an RE in any trust-equivalent type structure earns fees on the percentage of asset value (rather than income generated for example) it will earn more fees if asset values go higher over the short term.
Asset values could rise through a mix of equity raisings and debt at RFF, among other things.
Below I managed to find the disclosure of the fee structure in Rural Funds Management latest annual report.
Source: Rural Funds annual report to 30, June 2019.
Asset values are based on yields so if they are high over the short term so should be the asset values, but if they’re underinvested in over the medium term the scheme may start to suffer.
More importantly, this kind of RE to investment manager fee scheme is bog standard in the equity or securitised debt asset management industries for example.
The difference is that an RE in the say the equity asset management industry has no control over asset values. It’s simply dependent on stock market movements and the investment manager’s trading decisions as to the level of FUM.
Of course the higher the FUM for the RE the better, but it has no control over inflows or outflows. It only provides administrative services by appointment and any other fund accounting services or the like by appointment.
Rural Funds’ management structure is different and it’s working in the agricultural asset management industry that is far more subjective (in terms of valuation), opaque, and hard to get your head around.
RFF also has a tonne of debt.
For its part Rural Funds’ management insists there’s nothing to worry about as the groups’ interests are mutually beneficial.
It also insists the sale of the poultry assets for $72 million is a good deal and part of the long-term plan to reinvest into better assets.
It also reports it’s on course to pay dividends of 10.85 cents per share on earnings of 13.4 cents per share over FY 2020.
I am not a buyer of shares myself though.
The post Rural Funds faces new allegations from short seller Bucephalus appeared first on Motley Fool Australia.
You’re invited! For a limited time, The Motley Fool Australia is giving away an urgent new investment report detailing our 3 TOP BLUE CHIP SHARES to own in 2019.
So if you like trustworthy, stable, high-performing companies that pay fat fully franked dividends – we’ve got you covered!
Stock #1 is a beloved old Australian company turning its attention to high-margin businesses... and rapidly returning cash to shareholders with its hefty dividend...
While Stock #2 is an online powerhouse that’s rapidly gaining market share all around the globe... poised for years (or even decades) of tremendous growth...
Even better, Stock #3 offers a whopping 6.5% grossed-up dividend! Which beats the rates on term deposits right out of the water – and offers the potential for capital gains, too.
You can discover all three shares inside our new report right now. To scoop up your FREE copy, simply click the link below right now. But you will want to hurry – this free report is available for a LIMITED TIME ONLY!
- Man bets $221,666 on one ASX stock
- Top analysts name their top 3 ASX blue chip shares for 2019
- 3 quality dividend shares to boost your income
- NEW: Free report names top 3 ASX dividend shares to buy for 2019
- 5 Stocks for Potentially Building Wealth After 50
You can find Tom on Twitter @tommyr345
The Motley Fool Australia owns shares of and has recommended RURALFUNDS STAPLED. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Scott Phillips.
The Motley Fool's purpose is to help the world invest, better. Click here now for your free subscription to Take Stock, The Motley Fool's free investing newsletter. Packed with stock ideas and investing advice, it is essential reading for anyone looking to build and grow their wealth in the years ahead. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Bruce Jackson. 2019