Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    8,416.60
    -57.70 (-0.68%)
     
  • ASX 200

    8,150.00
    -55.20 (-0.67%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6799
    -0.0045 (-0.65%)
     
  • OIL

    74.45
    +0.74 (+1.00%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,673.20
    -6.00 (-0.22%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    91,293.52
    -202.34 (-0.22%)
     
  • XRP AUD

    0.78
    -0.00 (-0.32%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6190
    -0.0007 (-0.12%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.1031
    +0.0024 (+0.22%)
     
  • NZX 50

    12,619.94
    +47.28 (+0.38%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    20,035.02
    +241.67 (+1.22%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,280.63
    -1.89 (-0.02%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    42,352.75
    +341.16 (+0.81%)
     
  • DAX

    19,120.93
    +105.52 (+0.55%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    22,736.87
    +623.36 (+2.82%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,635.62
    +83.56 (+0.22%)
     

Retail investors among Rimfire Pacific Mining Limited's (ASX:RIM) largest shareholders, saw gain in holdings value after stock jumped 37% last week

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Rimfire Pacific Mining by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • The top 25 shareholders own 42% of the company

  • Insiders own 16% of Rimfire Pacific Mining

Every investor in Rimfire Pacific Mining Limited (ASX:RIM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 58% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Clearly, retail investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by AU$44m last week.

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Rimfire Pacific Mining.

See our latest analysis for Rimfire Pacific Mining

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rimfire Pacific Mining?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Rimfire Pacific Mining does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Rimfire Pacific Mining, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Rimfire Pacific Mining is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Reef Investments Pty Ltd, Asset Management Arm with 9.4% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.5% and 3.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

Insider Ownership Of Rimfire Pacific Mining

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Rimfire Pacific Mining Limited. Insiders have a AU$26m stake in this AU$163m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 58% of Rimfire Pacific Mining. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 16%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Rimfire Pacific Mining better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Rimfire Pacific Mining (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.