Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,974.80
    -27.70 (-0.35%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,724.30
    -25.40 (-0.33%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6618
    -0.0020 (-0.30%)
     
  • OIL

    78.49
    -0.13 (-0.17%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,348.40
    +30.40 (+1.31%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    100,177.47
    -110.27 (-0.11%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,374.27
    -43.60 (-3.08%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6178
    +0.0005 (+0.09%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0765
    +0.0012 (+0.12%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,864.89
    -7.75 (-0.07%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    19,659.80
    +82.88 (+0.42%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,146.86
    -16.81 (-0.21%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    38,589.16
    -57.94 (-0.15%)
     
  • DAX

    18,002.02
    -263.66 (-1.44%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,941.78
    -170.85 (-0.94%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,814.56
    +94.09 (+0.24%)
     

Recent 11% decline may not have gone down well with Magnetic Resources NL (ASX:MAU) insiders who've been purchasing recently

Key Insights

  • Significant insider control over Magnetic Resources implies vested interests in company growth

  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Recent purchases by insiders

Every investor in Magnetic Resources NL (ASX:MAU) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 46% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

And looking at our data, we can see that insiders have bought shares recently. So the news of stock price falling by 11% is not something they might have been expecting soon after purchasing shares.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Magnetic Resources, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for Magnetic Resources

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Magnetic Resources?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Magnetic Resources, for yourself, below.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Magnetic Resources. The company's largest shareholder is Chimseng Oan, with ownership of 14%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO George Sakalidis directly holds 3.4% of the total shares outstanding.

We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of Magnetic Resources

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Magnetic Resources NL. Insiders own AU$74m worth of shares in the AU$160m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 22%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Magnetic Resources is showing 5 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 3 of those are concerning...

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here