Q2 2024 Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc Earnings Call

Participants

Paula Schwartz; MD; Rx Communications Group LLC

Joel Marcus; Founder, Executive Chairman of the Board; Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc

Hallie Kuhn; SVP of Science & Technology and Capital Markets; Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.

Peter Moglia; Co-President and Regional Market Director, San Diego; Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc

Marc Binda; Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer; Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc

Farrell Granath; Analyst; Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Anthony Paolone; Analyst; JPMorgan Chase & Co

Michael Anderson Griffin; Analyst; Citigroup Inc.

Rich Anderson; Analyst; Wedbush Securities, Inc.

Wes Golladay; Analyst; Robert W. Baird & Co.

Michael Carroll; Analyst; RBC Dominion Securities Inc.

Vikram Malhotra; Analyst; Mizuho Financial Group

James Kammert; Analyst; Evercore ISI

Peter Abramowitz; Analyst; Jefferies

Dylan Brzezinski; Analyst; Green Street

Omotayo Okusanya; Analyst; Deutsche Bank

Presentation

Operator

Good day and welcome to the Alexandria Real Estate Equities Second Quarter 2024 conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. (Operator Instructions)
I would now like to turn the conference over to Paula Schwartz. Please go ahead.

Paula Schwartz

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. This conference call contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The company's actual results might differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the company's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
And now I'd like to turn the call over to Joel Marcus, Executive Chairman and Founder. Please go ahead, Joel.

Joel Marcus

Thank you, Paula, and welcome, everybody. With me today are Hallie, Peter, and Mark, and we welcome you to our second quarter earnings call and thank you and congratulations to the Alexandria family team for another very solid second quarter operating and financial performance, given the continuing uncertainty of the backdrop as soaring US debt and government spending problems continue pretty much unabated.
And then thinking about our daily efforts, we all think about the Navy Seal credo. The only easy day was yesterday. Also huge congrats to our team on the June 2024 release of our corporate responsibility report, which reinforces our long-standing operational excellence across what our one-of-a-kind lab space platform and to the team for securing 100% of the electricity needs with renewable energy for 100% of our Alexandria paid accounts in our Greater Boston cluster market, a phenomenal achievement. Thank you, team.
And thinking about long-term strategic thinking since the bull market of the life science industry turned in February of 2021, I would say the market moved from a historical long bull run to a bear market in, as I said, February of 21. And we've worked every single day to reengineer and fine tune our long-term competitive advantages of this one-of-a-kind leading lab space platform.
Our goal is much like it was, but very different given the facts, of course, after the 2008, 2009 great financial crisis and the bear market aftermath to position ourselves to come out of this sector bear market with the acumen and business strategy, really to enable our life science industry and tenant growth much as we lead the long historical bull market 2014 to 2021 with record-breaking earnings growth for our sector.
So, I'm thinking about our competitive advantages and what we choose to really emphasize, I think most importantly, our first mover advantage in the top life science clusters, we continue to refine and refocus our footprint. And you see that by our actions quarterly.
Our high quality assets aggregated in desirable and well amenitized mega campuses. We continue this monumental effort really driven to and by our redevelopment and development efforts in each of our massive mega campuses and our attempt to reduce and hopefully successful strategy.
Our nonmajor campus pipeline, future pipeline and obviously the sale of most of our noncore assets over time, that's going to be critical to our go-forward business plan, high-quality cash flows and substantial embedded future net operating income will be even more secure, given that platform focus, our long-standing tenant relationships that demonstrate stellar brand loyalty continue.
Lilly is a great example with multiple strategic relationships there. We continue to be backed by our fortress balance sheet with significant liquidity, unique and deep life science expertise, which is a hallmark of this company from day one and are very proud of our long tenured and highly experienced management team.
As I move from kind of our strategic thinking about what we need to do to be at the vanguard of the next bull market for life science, the life science industry, I want to take a reflection on my take of second quarter and our future planning. It goes without saying that we had a very solid FFO per share growth in this quarter this past quarter, second quarter, of course, of 5.3% and 6.3% for the six months this year and especially I think positive, given the backdrop.
An astounding 74% of our ARR comes from the mega campuses, and we hope to push that over 90% in a short handful of years as the major moat of our business. 53% of our ARR is from investment grade or big cap companies. The strong quality of cash flows and the 96% of our leases having contractual rental rate increases gives us great future protection.
We've maintained stable occupancy with a very solid leasing quarter with solid economics, and we continue to have very solid cash same-store NOI growth. Our EBITDA margins are best in class, and we're also working hard to reduce our go-forward CapEx and G&A.
We are anchored by our fortress balance sheet, as I've said, with strong liquidity and almost one third of our debt expires after 2049 with an average term of 13 years. Over the next few months, we are laser focused on leasing the remaining 1 million approximately square foot rolling this year and getting a strong jump on the significant 2025 rollovers.
Also over the next few months, we are laser focused on our '24 and '25 deliveries and continue to increase our leasing on those well beyond the current 87% to drive NOI growth. We're making significant progress on our recycling of capital for 2024 and beyond. And finally, the life science industry, which Hallie will comment on in depth here is the crown jewel in the cherished industry of our country and truly the world's leader in innovation in the discovery of new medicines.
It is virtually the only industry which fundamentally enables better health, well-being and longer and happier lives. We have built this one-of-a-kind company to be at the vanguard of this cherished life science industry as it recovers from the aftermath of the COVID rocket ship.
And without further ado, let me turn it over to Hallie .

Hallie Kuhn

Thank you, Joel, and good afternoon, everyone. This is Hallie Kuhn, SVP of Life Science & Capital Markets. Today, I'm going to review 2Q '24 life science industry performance demand across our strong and diverse tenant base and the incredible innovation that is propelling the growth of the life science sector.
As I walk through the details, there are two main points I want to underscore. First, the $5 trillion secularly growing life science industry continues to command robust levels of capital from diverse funding sources. And second, the life science innovation is advancing at a historic pace, yielding new medicines that extend and save lives.
Starting at the beginning of the life cycle of innovation, biomedical and government institutions, which account for 10% of our ARR catalyzed discoveries that fueled deeper understanding of disease biology and early development of new medicines.
In addition to the NIH budget of $49 billion in 2024, $57 billion was contributed to the biomedical research last year through philanthropic organizations. While institutions may be the engine for early innovation, private biotech companies, which represent another 10% of our ARR, are the fuel advancing research discoveries into potential new medicines.
Private life science venture funding was robust this quarter, exceeding $12 billion. While down from the peak in 2022, this year is on track to be the third highest year and life science venture dollars ever deployed.
Next are pre-commercial public biotech companies representing 9% ARR. Remarkably follow-on financing and private placements are at historic highs, eclipsing $10 billion in the second quarter with 2024 financing already exceeding full year 2023 levels.
This activity is juxtaposed against limited IPO volume and the XPI, which is up moderately for the year, but lagged the broader markets. We caution that the XPI is an imperfect barometer for public biotech. The reality is a picture of have and have-nots. Biotechs that meet clinical milestones, have ample access to liquidity and see positive stock performance while those that lack meaningful inflection points are faced with a challenging market reality.
Next our commercial stage biopharma and large multinational pharmaceutical companies, representing 17% and 20% of ARR, respectively. Biopharma continues to commit historic levels of capital to internal R&D and external innovation. 2023 R&D spend nearly $300 billion and the industry set records for M&A, driven by an estimated $200 billion to $300 billion of revenue at risk in the next five years due to patent expirations.
In 2022, this pace has continued with over $60 billion in M&A announced. On the ground, leasing from this cohort is driven by the need to recruit and retain scientific talent, critical to developing new medicines essential to meeting near and long-term growth targets.
This is illustrated by the 127,000 square foot lease we announced this quarter with a large multinational pharmaceutical company on our SD tech by Alexandria mega campus in San Diego. Banning the entire lifecycle of innovation is the life science product, service, and device tenant segment, which represents 21% ARR.
Relevant to this segment is the BIOSECURE Act., which, if passed, will limit utilization of select Chinese contract manufacturing and research organizations. We view this legislation as largely positive. It includes grandfathering provisions to minimize near-term impact to biotech companies while creating an incentive for US-based contract manufacturing and research organizations to onshore capabilities.
The output of the entire innovation cycle, our novel medicines that make it into the hands of patients. Through June, the FDA approved 21 novel small molecule and biologic therapies. And separately approved five novel gene and cell therapies of approximately 500 novel FDA therapies approved since 2013, 50% were developed by Alexandria tenants.
Highlighting one recent approval, this month, the FDA approved Alexandria tenant, Eli Lilly's novel antibody for treatment of early Alzheimer's disease. As many listening today have experienced firsthand, Alzheimer's is devastating affecting one out of every nine individuals over 65 in the US.
While recently approved Alzheimer's medicines can slow disease, there's still not a cure and there remains much work to be done. In the same way that 10 years ago, obesity was considered too complex to treat with medicines and now has been transformed by GLP-1 therapies developed by Alexandria tenants, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordis.
10 years in the future, we may have medicines that completely alter the paradigm of diseases such as Alzheimer's, rendering them treatable or even preventable conditions. Coming full circle, the life science industry continues to demonstrate sustained strength energized by this incredible pace of innovation and reinforced by diverse sources of funding.
As the trusted partner to the world's leading life science companies that span the entire life cycle of innovation, our mission remains steadfast to create and grow life science ecosystems and clusters that Ignite and accelerate the world's leading innovators in their Novo pursuit to advance human health insurer disease.
With that, I will pass it over to Peter.

Peter Moglia

Thank you Hallie. Respected economist recently made the case that pent-up demand from the pandemic has continued to be a key source of inflation, which is one of the reasons the raising of short-term rates has been ineffective and that sectors of the economy with pent-up demand will continue powering the economy going forward in 2024 regardless of rates or who wins the election.
Healthcare was one of the sectors mentioned patients returning to doctors' offices and hospitals are releasing pent-up demand for therapies and medicines, which should send a strong signal to the industry to grow and we look forward to enabling that growth.
I'm going to discuss our development pipeline leasing, supply and asset sales and then hand it over to Mark. In the second quarter, we delivered 284,982 square feet, 100% leased, with 92% of the space contained in mega campuses located in our high barrier to entry submarkets. The annual incremental NOI delivered during the quarter equaled $16 million, bringing the year-to-date total to $42 million.
Development and redevelopment and leasing of approximately 341,000 square feet was more than three times the volume of last quarter led by strong credit tenant leasing. The ability to execute on our development redevelopment pipeline when others are clearly struggling is mainly attributed to our strong brand built on operational excellence and the attractiveness of our mega campus platform, which houses 69 (technical difficulty) 26 and beyond are 40% leased or under negotiation because of our continuing strong execution during the quarter.
Our development redevelopment pipeline is expected to deliver very significant incremental NOI of approximately $480 million in the near to medium term. $187 million of this NOI is expected to be delivered through the fourth quarter of '25 and the remaining $293 million will be delivered from the first quarter of '26 through the first quarter of '28.
To execute on this, we will only need to average approximately 61% of the leasing per quarter through one -- through the first quarter of '28 than we executed this quarter. Transitioning the leasing and supply, the leasing market is in a flight to quality.
Failed projects are often in tertiary markets and operated by inexperienced entities with little to no know-how or capital to fund tenant improvements. The majority of fully vacant buildings in our markets are recently delivered buildings from these entities who majorly on estimated the skill sets need to be successful in life science real estate and pick sites as if they were investing in office.
High-quality locations in the core areas of innovation and high quality sponsorship matters. Many of these new entrants are learning that the hard way. Alexandria sets the standard for sponsorship and life science real estate and our consistent occupancy, tenant retention and strong tenant relationships, which accounted for 83% of our leasing during the quarter.
Our reflections of that moat we have created with our high-quality mega campus model residing in AAA locations, our operational excellence, and our fortress balance sheet. Although the search rings of the tenant bases have expanded with the delivery of new supply, the strike rings have tightened as quality tenants, leery of inexperienced and undercapitalized developers choose the trusted brand.
We leased 1,000,100, 14,001 square feet during the second quarter, highlighted by the strong leasing and development and redevelopment pipeline I noted earlier. GAAP and cash rental rate increases were 7.4% and 3.7%, respectively. Over 90% of our renewals were either neutral or had a positive mark-to-market.
On competitive supply, 2024 is going to be the peak year for new deliveries and then it will begin to dissipate in 2025 to about half of what we'll deliver in 2024. We are likely to see little to no new deliveries from for tenders after 2025, unless projects currently under construction are delayed.
I'll conclude with an update on our value harvesting asset recycling program. As mentioned on the last call, our value harvesting transactions will be heavily weighted towards the third and fourth quarters, but significant progress continues to be made.
During the quarter, we closed on the $60 million non-income-producing asset in New York and increased our pending transactions subject to letters of intent or purchase and sale agreement negotiations by approximately $549 million to a total of $806.7 million.
This combined with our $77.2 million in closed sales and $27 million of forward equity sales agreements expected to be settled in 2024 brings our pending and closed transactions to $884 million, approximately 59% of the midpoint of guidance for dispositions, partial interest sales and equity.
Interest in our noncore asset sales remains consistent, and we believe the anticipated rate cuts and buying of the financial markets will bring more buyers and have a positive effect on values. The lack of financing available to investors has been the driver of the widely reported lack of capital markets activity in the broad market.
Capital flows have a major impact on valuations and commercial real estate debt has trended downward as a percentage of GDP for the last two years prior to the first quarter of '24. However, this appears to be reversing as new CMBS issuance for the first half of 2024 is up nearly threefold from the same period last year, which should provide positive momentum for our current and future efforts.
With that, I'll pass it over to Marc.

Marc Binda

Thank you, Pierre. This is Mark Binda , CFO. Hello and good afternoon, everyone. We reported solid operating and financial results for the second quarter. Total revenues and analyzed for 2Q '24 were up 7.4% and 9.4%, respectively over 2Q '23, primarily driven by solid same-property performance and continued execution of our development and redevelopment strategy.
FFO per share diluted as adjusted for the quarter was $2.36, up 5.4% over 2Q '23 and was ahead of consensus. We reiterated the midpoint of our full year 2024 guidance for FFO per share diluted as adjusted of $9.47, which is up 5.6% over the prior year.
The key assumptions to FFO as adjusted generally remain within our prior guidance ranges. And so they remain unchanged with the one exception being the change to our sources and uses for the Tech Square ground lease amendment, which I'll get to later.
I'll start with internal growth. Our solid operating results for the quarter were driven by our disciplined execution of our mega campus strategy, tremendous scale, long-standing tenant relationships and operational excellence by our team. 74% of our annual rental revenue comes from our collaborative mega campuses.
We have high quality cash flows with 53% of our annual rental revenue from investment grade and publicly traded large cap tenants. Collections remain very high at 99.9% and adjusted EBITDA margins continued to be strong at 72% for the quarter.
Turning to leasing, leasing volume was strong for the quarter in the first half of 2024 at 1.1 million and 2.3 million square feet, respectively. The second quarter is up 27% over the average of the back half of 2023 and is consistent with our historical quarterly average for the period from 2013 to 2020.
We continue to benefit from our tremendous scale, high quality tenant roster and brand loyalty with 79% of our leasing activity over the last 12 months coming from our existing deep well of approximately 800 tenant relationships including the 127,000 square foot development lease that was executed this quarter with a multinational pharma company at our mega campus development in Sorrento Mesa.
The rental rate increases for the first half of '24 were strong at 26.2% and 15% on a cash basis. And our outlook for rental rate growth for the full year '24 remains solid at 11% to 19% and 5% to 13% on a cash basis. Rental rate growth for lease renewals and re-leasing of space for the quarter was 7.4% and 3.7% on a cash basis.
As we've noted in the past, the rental rate increases can vary from quarter to quarter based upon a particular mix of lease expirations. Lease terms on new leases completed in the first half of 2024 were 7.7 years, which is consistent with 5 out of the last 10 years, which had lease terms in the seven to eight year range.
The overall mark to market for cash rental rates related to in-place leases for our entire asset base remains solid at 12% TI's on renewals and releasing of space to the quarter of $31.83 were consistent with our historical per square foot average since 2020 of $31.7 in the year to date amount is significantly below our historical average at $25.32.
Our total non-revenue enhancing expenditures, including TI's on renewals and releasing of space are expected to be in the 12% to 13% range as a percentage of net operating income in 2024, which is below our five-year average of about 15% and highlights the durable nature of our laboratory infrastructure.
Same property NOI growth for 2Q '24 was solid at 1.5% and 3.9% on a cash basis, driven by solid rental rate growth and leasing volume for our full year same property growth is consistent with our last update of 1.54% on a cash basis at the mid points. Occupancy for the quarter was solid at 94.6%, which is consistent with the prior two quarters.
Turning to lease expirations, our team has done a great job of addressing 2020 for leasing expirations. Unresolved lease expirations remaining for the balance of 2024 are pretty modest of 637,192 square feet to result, excluding the 350,000 square foot lease expiration related to the New York asset, we disposed of in July.
Looking ahead to the first quarter of 2025, we highlight a few key lease expirations aggregating 600,000 square feet with $37 million of annual rental revenue that are expected to have 12 to 24 months of downtime on a weighted average basis with more than half of that coming from a lease expiration with more data at Tech Square, which, as a reminder, recently expanded into 462,000 square feet at the recently completed 325 Binney project. These spaces may require some time to re-lease and or reposition the assets and are likely to remain as operating assets.
Please refer to (technical difficulty) page 23 of our supplemental package for additional details there.
Turning next to external growth. During the quarter, we continued to execute our development and redevelopment strategy by delivering 284,982 square feet in the pipeline, which will generate $16 million of incremental annual net operating income.
We also expect to see similar growth in incremental annual net operating income on a cash basis of $80 million from executed leases as the initial free rent from recent deliveries burns off over the next seven months on a weighted average basis.
As a reminder, this $80 million for previously delivered projects and is not part of the projected go forward $480 million of net operating income associated with current projects. We have 5.4 million of rentable square feet of development and redevelopment projects there. 61% leased or negotiating. And those projects are expected to generate $480 million of incremental annual net or operating income over the next four years, including $187 million over the next six quarters.
In July, we completed an extension of our ground lease at Alexandria Technology Square. This will require a prepayment of rent of two $135 million amounts in 4Q '24 and 1Q '25 and commoditized into non-recoverable ground rent expense starting in 3Q '24 through 2088 on a straight-line basis. We increased our guidance range for dispositions, sales of partial interest income and equity to reflect the funding for the first ground lease payment due in 4Q '24.
A few key items to note. First, we view this asset Tech Square as a generational asset located adjacent to MIT in Cambridge at the center of Maine [Maine] with several important relationships located on the campus.
Second, since we acquired this mega campus in 2006 NIY has nearly quadrupled over our ownership period. And third, even with the expected prepayment of rent, we believe this adjust to a very attractive annual ground rent cost relative to market over the next 65 years.
And ultimately, we believe that this extension enhances the long-term value of the campus. For all these reasons, we are very pleased with the outcome.
I'll turn next to cap interest. We continue to focus on the completion of committed and or under construction projects, which are expected to generate $480 million of incremental annualized through 1Q '28 as well as important preconstruction activities, adding value and focused on reducing the time from lease execution to delivery.
Capitalized interest has declined three quarters in a row, primarily due to the delivery of projects in the pipeline, which generated $187 million of incremental annual net operating income over that time and a decline in average real estate basis, subject to capitalization of $1.9 billion from a peak in 3Q '23 to 2Q '24.
Our outlook for capitalized interest for '24 is consistent with our previous guidance and continues to assume around a 10% decline on an average basis, subject to capitalization for the full year '24 compared to '23. Transitioning next to the balance sheet. We continue to have one of the strongest balance sheets amongst all publicly traded US treats, and we look for opportunities to continue enhancing our fortress balance sheet.
Our corporate credit ratings are in the top 10% of all publicly traded US reads. Our leverage continues to remain low at 5.4 times for net debt to adjusted EBITDA on a quarterly annualized basis. And we have an attractive debt profile with fixed rate debt comprising 97.3% of our total debt and a weighted average remaining term of debt of 13 years.
We also have tremendous liquidity of $5.6 billion, supported by our $5 billion revolving credit facility, and we're very pleased with the recent agreement to extend our credit facility through January 2030, and we think are fantastic banking relationships for the tremendous support to help us continue our mission.
We remain disciplined with our strategy for long-term funding of our business and recycling capital from dispositions and partial interest sales to minimize the issuance of common stock. Our disposition strategy is heavily weighted towards outright dispositions of assets, not integral to our mega campus strategy, allowing us to enhance the quality of our asset base.
We may also consider reducing the size of our future pipeline through asset recycling into the current pipeline and into our mega campuses.
July '24, we completed the sale of a vacant non laboratory building located in Manhattan for $60 million. This building was designated as held for sale in 4Q '23 and was sold following the lease expiration for the full building in July '24.
In aggregate it totaled completed and pending disposition dispositions under negotiation plus a small amount of equity we raised on the ATM aggregates $912 million or 59% at the midpoint of our guidance of $1.55 billion. While the macro environment remains challenging, we are reasonably optimistic that we can execute on our disposition plan in 2024 at values representing a reasonable cost of capital.
Based upon our outlook, as of today, we plan to pause on future issuances under the ATM program, at least for the next quarter. We also expect to fund a meaningful amount of our equity needs with retained cash flows from operating activities after dividends of $450 million at the midpoint of our guidance for '24.
Our high-quality cash flows continue to support the growth in our annual net -- our annual common stock dividend with an average annual increase in dividend per share of 5% since 2020, and we continue to have a conservative FFO payout ratio of 55% for 2Q '24.
Realized gains from venture investments included in FFO per share as adjusted were 33.4 in the quarter and $62.2 million for the six months ended June. On an annualized basis based upon the first six months of '24, that would take realized gains towards the high end of our guidance range for the full year of $95 million to $125 million.
Gross unrealized gains in our venture investments as of 2Q '24 were $284 million on a cost basis of $1.2 billion. We've updated our guidance for 2024 for EPS of $2.98 to $3.10, and we maintained our guidance range for FFO per share diluted as adjusted with no change to the midpoint of $9.47, which represents a solid 5.6% growth in FFO per share for 2024.
With that let me turn it back to Joel.

Joel Marcus

Thank you, Mark. And operator, we'll go to questions, please.

Question and Answer Session

Operator

Yes, sir. (Operator Instructions)
Joshua Dennerlein, Bank of America.

Farrell Granath

Hi, this is Farrell Granath on behalf of Josh. I quickly wanted to ask about, as you were mentioning, the Alexandria Technology Square mega campus that the repositioning going from multi-tenant or going to multi-tenancy from single tenancy. I was wondering if you could discuss the driver of this change if you're seeing any shift in demand of the market for single tenants?

Joel Marcus

Well, I think there's no fundamental change. As I think as Mark mentioned McDermott is, has essentially or is moving out of that space in Tech Square to 100 and moving to their new R&D and HQ headquarters at three to five Binney. So they leave behind a laboratory assets in that space or spaces and our plan is to re-lease those generally as a young as a multi-tenant situation.
So it's not really any change. We clearly knew for a long period of time that McDermott was leaving. And this is just part of their growth and something we've done time and time again. Just remember, Alexandria Technology Square sits right across the street from MIT main Science Campus and you've got the best the location in the world when it comes to laboratory space.

Farrell Granath

Great. Thank you. And also, I noticed in between the 1Q, 2Q, letters of intent and pending along with closed acquisitions, that there was a slight kind of I don't know, dropping off of the LOI's. So could you comment on that either if things are coming out of the pipeline, do different circumstances on pricing negotiations.

Joel Marcus

Peter, do you want to confident on that ?

Peter Moglia

Yes so, I'm just going to see. I think what you're referring to is that the lease percentage on the development pipeline, if it wasn't that leases are leased and then weren't leased. What happened there was we actually had a little bit more square feet into one of the assets at 311 arcs. And all of that was a project that has been coming back to us in phases. And so the project just got larger this quarter and as a result, the lease percentage went down. So I don't know that there was any type of surprise there.

Farrell Granath

I think when what I was referring to is the outcome on the acquisition page with the supplemental. The pending acquisition signed letters of intent. It's just when adding them together and taking out what was completed in 2Q '24. I think there's a slight difference this quarter over quarter. Is that what you're referring to for the purchase price for what ss this page 5 of the supplemental?

Peter Moglia

Yes. No, I don't think there's some. But if you look at last quarter, the pending items that we were looking at. I think that number's come down a little bit, but I think that number came down by a pretty small amount, if I recall correctly. So I don't know if there's anything shocking or surprising from our end. I think we're focused on and conserving capital and putting our capital into the active pipeline and focused on dispositions at the moment.

Farrell Granath

Okay. Thank you. I appreciate it.

Operator

Thank you.
Anthony Paolone, JPMorgan.

Anthony Paolone

Yes, thank you. Can you talk a bit about just cap rates on the pending $806 million of sales or stake sales, and just maybe even more broadly, any updates across your markets as it relates to property values, cap rates?

Joel Marcus

Yes, Peter ?

Peter Moglia

Yes, look at the things that will have cap rates published, I think you'll find to be in line with our commentary of good quality assets are still in demand. I don't want to spoil any thunder for next quarter, but we do have a couple of things that are going that are pretty good.
Non-core assets, though, can certainly not necessarily be representative of our prime assets that we plan on holding in perpetuity. But cap rates are a tough thing to figure out these days. What people's returns, what they're looking for largely depends on their cost of capital, which has been varied throughout the last few quarters.
But , I'm going to go ahead and wait till I think next quarter we'll have something to publish and you'll see the numbers.

Anthony Paolone

Okay. And then just you mentioned a couple of times in the prepared remarks about just the increased leading into the mega campus strategy and you've been shedding more non-core. Is there like a percentage of the portfolio you'd characterize as kind of not fitting the long-term strategy at this point that you can provide?

Peter Moglia

Well, I think if you look at, the percentage of our are coming from the mega campuses and that's not you have a series of assets. Remember, this company was built over decades on individual acquisitions and then individual redevelopments and developments. And then the first mega campus that we bought was Tech Square, in fact, in 2006.
And that really kind of launch that strategy followed by Campus Point in 2010 and then the New York campus, which was our first mega development campus. So I think you just have to think of it in terms of these are still really very, very good assets. And we've moved in many cases and shed many of our workhorse assets in the suburbs.
And we still have are quite a number of standalone assets, not really in the outer suburbs that we've transacted over the last handful of years and I think we're looking at that. So I'm not sure it's easy to give you exact percentages. But as I said, our main goal is to move our mega campus annual rental revenue into the high 80s or low 90s over the next short term four years. Antony, if that's helpful.

Anthony Paolone

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you.
Michael Griffin, Citi.

Michael Anderson Griffin

Great thanks. My first question was just on the leasing environment. And I noticed for the renewals there was a decline in the weighted average lease term relative to last quarter. Can you maybe give some insights. Was it specific to the renewals that were coming up? Is that more indicative of tenants maybe being unsure of their footprint? I really realize that one quarter doesn't make a trend, but any commentary around that would be helpful.

Joel Marcus

Yes. So I'll ask Peter to comment from his perspective. But I think if you think about again, you said individual leases that come up quarter to quarter, certainly drive those stats. I think it's fair to say and how we've commented on this on a number of occasions, we're seeing more demand from the earlier stage companies and the revenue generating companies.
It's the in-between, the biotechs that are in the clinic waiting for clinical milestone achievement that, you know, I think has caused some of the disruption in the normal leasing transactions that have gone on. And I think this quarter that there was just more at the earlier stage. And those people can't commit to 10 or 15-year leases because they're likely to grow.
And that's the reason to have them on a mega campus because we can provide them 5,000, 10, 20, 30 whatever they want, and we can double and triple their footprint on a mega campus, whereas an individual building, oftentimes you can't really do that?

Peter Moglia

Hey, Michael, it's Peter. A great observation. We saw one of the first things that I noticed when I started looking at the numbers and Joe is absolutely spot on. It's serendipitous that we had just stay a large portion of the leasing was for early-stage companies. And as Joe mentioned, those companies tend to sign shorter term leases because they expect to be much bigger in the future.
And Joel, exactly right. One of the reasons that we adopted a mega campus strategy because we have these types of tenants that will grow within the main campus. So but yet no trend other than just serendipity.

Michael Anderson Griffin

Peter, does those smaller tenants, I guess require larger TI packages. I noticed that free rent was stable quarter over quarter, but it seemed like TI.s and LCs went up. So was that just a one-off maybe driven by one lease or what was driving that?

Peter Moglia

Well, Mark mentioned in his comments that although it was higher than maybe last couple of full quarters, that PILC number was about our average since 2020, these are renewals so it's going to numbers will vary from quarter to quarter based on the work that needs to be done on the suite. Mark mentioned in his comments, the recycling, the durability of our of our spaces.
We don't have to put a lot of CapEx to continue to lease and to continue to do leverage off previous investment. But in certain cases you have a tenant that might need to do some reconfiguration or you might have had a lease that's in a space that's 15 years old. There's obviously got to put more money into it.
So it's again, it's not a trend. It's not a market trend like it would be we've talked about things from Shell. The TIs have gone up considerably because tenants don't want to invest in the space like they used to have to. But in the case, of renewals. It's done. It's just lease-by-lease. What does the space look like? What is the tenant need, but it's still if you consider the inflation that has happened in construction costs, $30 is still not a lot of money to be averaging on renewals.

Michael Anderson Griffin

And then maybe just one more, if I could find on the development pipeline. I noticed that the 651 Gateway project was pushed to 26, is this just a function of maybe more tepid demand and South San Francisco? And what point would you have to stop capitalizing costs on this project and start having it flow into the income statement?

Joel Marcus

Yeah, that's exactly correct of all the markets -- submarkets, South San Francisco, certainly as we've highlighted, and Peter has talked about that for quite a number of quarters has one of the most outsized supply issues. Remember too, this is an old building that we inherited in a joint venture.
So the time and effort to get this redeveloped is just what it is. The good news is we have several transactions going on that weren't alive last quarter. So I think that's good news, Mark, and comment on the determination of capitalization.

Marc Binda

Yeah, Michael, yes, there's not a magic number there in terms of when it would turn off. There's continuing activities today and doing work on those floors that remain to be leased and delivered. But yeah, if there was a situation where those activity ceased where the demand just couldn't catch up with the supply there, then we would then we would have to shut down those portions of the project that no longer have activities, we'll continue to watch that very carefully.

Michael Anderson Griffin

Great. That's it for me. Thanks for the time.

Operator

Rich Anderson, Wedbush.

Rich Anderson

Thanks. Good morning. Out there or good afternoon. Excuse me. So on the leasing front, you had the mix issue this past quarter but a few sort of look at what you did in the first half and compare that to what you're guiding to, which didn't change, that would imply like a GAAP number of eight average 8% up in the second half and a cash average of about five. Is that about is that right? Am I thinking about that correctly? If I just do a some product of the of the math or am I missing something?

Marc Binda

Yeah, I can take that one. Hi Rich.
Yeah, it's not a perfect analysis, right, because volume can vary from quarter to quarter, particularly in the -- in that re-leasing renewal bucket, right? That's only a fraction of the total leasing. So it's not a perfect analysis.
But yeah, I mean, I think you're right that the first half of the year was very strong. It's the numbers are actually above the high end of our mid-point, but we feel comfortable with our guidance we've got out there, which we still think is very strong in this environment. And it does imply on average slightly lower numbers than the first half, but I think we're still very pleased with where we expect to come out for the year.

Rich Anderson

Okay. And Peter I'm going to see if I can ask a cap rate question, a different angle, if you shut me down as well, but do you have a differential between core and non-core assets in terms of cap rates, is there a spread that you guys think about in terms of what you think is have a long-term hold, what's not?

Peter Moglia

I mean, I would think about it in the way of long-term holds really mega campuses and the prime core locations. And you've seen us put up really strong numbers there. And then we've got some good assets that we've owned them because they were good assets, but they're not mega campuses.
They're typically not within the Core-Mark, core centers of innovation, but they were areas that supported research for different reasons and might be 100 basis points to 200 basis points spread between something prime and something not so prime.

Rich Anderson

Okay, great. Last question. You're funding a lot of your development or most of it with dispositions. And I'm curious if you think that by doing so you'd guess expose yourself to impairments in this market. Do you kind of view this in some ways as a cleansing event that I suppose you do like you wouldn't necessarily be using dispositions if your stock was at $200 a share, but you are? Is there is that the silver lining to this long term, in your opinion, or is that not the way to look at it?

Joel Marcus

Well, I'll comment and then Peter, can. I think the answer is yes in the sense that we feel that the industry has been on a tear for, as I said, the 2014 to 2021 and then the rocket ship and then kind of the drop-off from that and it's pretty clear that in today's fairly, way more disciplined allocation of capital from the life science industry.
More and more, it's clear to us, it's been clear for a long time, but even more so today that the best prospects for leasing and either keeping a tenant or attracting a new tenant is to give them great optionality on a mega campus, great amenities and that's where we want to refocus our double down our efforts and we've gone a long way to bring that to reality, but we think that's where we wanted to be out a period of time where we have fewer and fewer non-core assets because I think they don't give us the optionality to attract or grow with tenants the way we want to grow, not that the buildings aren't leasable to some of them are absolutely great. Great buildings and have great tenants.

Peter Moglia

I guess I think it is a bit of a silver lining, but I would say that it would have happened anyway because of our observation that the mega campus model was where we needed to be headed. So ultimately, those assets may be it was it would have been at a slower pace, but we would have been selling on those non-core non mega campus assets over time anyway.

Joel Marcus

And we really have done that if you look at Greater Boston, may we didn't have the money to get into Cambridge or even [while Sam], in the early days. So we started out in [worcester] and so the evolution of how we've looked at each of the submarkets is we've gone from kind of outer burbs to kind of the inner core just as the company has grown. And now we just want to refine and hone that strategy and we feel like we started that back as early as 2006 and now we're doubling down on it.

Rich Anderson

Okay, great color. Thanks.

Operator

Wes Golladay, Baird.

Wes Golladay

Hi, everyone. I'm just looking at the dispositions. I think you have about 10 million square feet of non-mega campus development potential? How much of that would you like to, I guess be part of your disposition program?

Joel Marcus

Yeah, go ahead, Peter.

Peter Moglia

Yeah, like I and Joel mentioned it earlier that our development pipeline may shrink in the future and something that's non-income-producing like land is very accretive to sell and to use to fund our current pipeline or in our future in place pipelines, of course, we would like to. If we are -- in certain areas, we if we have land that we can market and sell, we will. So it will certainly be part of our strategy.

Wes Golladay

And then looking at the ground lease purchase, you did mention it was a generational asset. Did have a lot of term on it already before you extended it. Is there any other round leases, you're looking to extend actively at the moment?

Peter Moglia

One thing I'd point, Marc, you absolutely can answer this. But one thing I want to point out is, I think it was a really strong move for us to do that today because this was a situation where we had more leverage today than we would have in better times. So sometimes you have to make a make moves even if it's a tough environment because long term, it's going to really set you up well. Marc, do you want to answer the other part of the question?

Marc Binda

Yes, sure. I guess I was just going to say Tech Square, if you look at the ARR subject to ground lease was far and away the largest ground lease that we have. It was about a third of the ARR subject to ground leases and the balance of that is spread across, I think, 29 different properties.
And then if you think about where the lease terms are kind of pro forma basis, once the amendments are now the amendments done. It's a little bit north of 60 plus years. So I think we've got some pretty good term on in terms of the remainder of our ground leases.

Wes Golladay

Great. Thanks for the time, everyone.

Operator

Michael Carroll, RBC Capital Markets.

Michael Carroll

Yeah, thanks, Peter, I want to follow up on Mike's question earlier in the call. I mean, is there a reason why most of the leasing activity is coming from early-stage biotech companies is that a trend we should expect to continue over the next few quarters. Is that just kind of unique towards the activity this specific quarter?

Peter Moglia

Well, look, it is consistent with the way we've characterize demand, buy and large across our regions. There's been a barbell of early-stage companies being very active in large pharma being very active and not as much in the middle due to a lack or not necessarily a lack of wanting to grow, but lack of confidence to grow.
So we do expect that the middle will fill in over time, especially considering the metrics at how we started to do it or had presented. But it's not a trend. It just happened to be. We had a number of earlier stage company leases rolling, and it just was a coincidence.

Hallie Kuhn

Hi this is Hallie, I was just going to reiterate that certainly we see funding being strong across multiple data points. Venture certainly looks great this year, follow-on financing have been very strong, and we continue to see demand across the diversity of our tenant portfolio.
If you look at our tenant pie chart broken out by ARR. So I'll certainly demand may look different from quarter to quarter from any given segment. I don't think there is one specific trends that is driving demand from only one of these tenant segments. That's the beauty of the life science industry is the diversity of the types of companies we have in our portfolio.

Michael Carroll

I think, you guys provide an update on your supply outlook? I know in prior calls you provided some stats given the scheduled deliveries in '24 and in 2025 as a percentage of inventory in the top three cluster markets, I mean, have those stats changed at all? Or can you provide us an update on how you're viewing that?

Peter Moglia

Look, we didn't want to bore you all with the same numbers over and over and over again, I'd say the only real material change was there was a lot of deliveries in San Francisco this past quarter, but it's progressing like we thought you were in the under 5% of total inventory left to deliver in this year and then next year, about half of that amount will deliver next year.
So from this, the amount that is left to deliver in '24 is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year and so it's progressing like we thought it's the same amount, of sales we don't see some material amount of as supply dissipating, we also don't see a material amount of supply being added.

Michael Carroll

Okay. And then just last one for me, and I already talked about the Gateway project, but I know you had two developments that were 100% leased at Winter Street and Harriet timing in way that got pushed out. It looks like roughly a quarter or so. Is that just delays in the construction? Or is there any reasons why those stabilizations were put out pushed out a few quarters?

Joel Marcus

I can take that one, Michael. Yeah, I mean, you're right. The project at 230 Harriet Tubman was pushed out, I think, a quarter. That project's 100% leased. Same with 840 Winter. It's a similar story on both of them, that they're 100% leased, and the tenant programming just ends up making the construction a little bit longer, so that just happens sometimes.

Michael Carroll

Okay, great. Thank you.

Operator

Vikram Malhotra, Mizuho.

Vikram Malhotra

Afternoon. Thanks for the questions. I guess, Joel, maybe to take a picture, you laid out a pretty compelling longer-term scenario for life sciences in the portfolio. I just want you to, if you could help us marry that with the near-term. Sounded like there's still some challenges, but also we're inflecting from a supply delivery standpoint, so just help us, like, what should we be watching for near-term inflection? Sounded like a little more tepid near-term than the long-term.

Joel Marcus

Yeah, thank you for the question, and I think it's a good one. I think you have to remember that we've seen, the internet bubble crash in 2000, the GFC in 2008, 2009, and then kind of the blow-up of the rocket ship of COVID as it kind of came down to earth, and each one is kind of different. I think this time we don't have financial institution problems. We don't have lots of companies that had kind of fake business plans failing, like back in 2000, not so much biotech, but certainly in the dot-com bubble era.
I think this time, we've never seen supply in our particular niche. Supply has always been there, but it's never been oversupplied in a sense, and so when you combine that oversupply with more muted demand coming off just rocket ship demand of 2021, I mean, our leasing quadrupled during some of those quarters and years, which you just know can't be sustained.
I think that's the overarching issue, and the industry, and Hallie did a great job of articulating the segments, is mission critical. It's the crown jewel of this country. It's critical to the health of our citizenry and beyond, and I think that and the funding factors and diversity is very, very strong.
How that translates into is the big question everybody wants answered, but there's no algorithm to do it. How that translates into a more consistent and robust demand. And I think that's what we're all, kind of working through, and every cycle's just different, and so, we're very optimistic about the future. Obviously, we wouldn't be in this business if we weren't, but we know that we have to make adjustments to, our assets, our capital plan, and make sure that we have, we're best positioning the company to help our 800 tenants grow and attract a whole lot more, and we think by selling, more of the non-core assets. Slimming down the future pipeline a bit, and doubling down on the mega campus is the right strategy till, the market really turns.
And I think, whether the election, whether it's, the executive branch or each of the houses, helps reinforce a more robust economic environment. It's hard to say, as I said in my prepared remarks, debt, debt service, and the overall health of that, of the economy given, debt to GDP and so forth. A lot of really smart people have, pined on that issue, and we want to make sure that if there's a bigger shock out there to the system, we're extremely well protected. So, sorry for the long answer.

Vikram Malhotra

No, that's helpful, and just maybe one more. I guess maybe, Marc, you can, or Peter, you've done a bunch of repositioning’s or at least put properties into repositioning, and I'm just trying to understand, like, bigger picture what the opportunity set is or how to split it between, like, this was office. We always intended it to reposition to lab versus, hey, we got to just redevelop.
So, like, for example, the Apple, the repositioning where Apple was, correct me if I'm wrong. I thought that was going to be a renewal originally, but now you're repositioning it. So, I'm just trying to think about the opportunity set down the road and, like, what the impact of numbers is.

Marc Binda

Yeah, I can take that one, Vikram. Yeah, so on the Apple one that you mentioned, or really in Austin, we're renewing some of that space. If you look at the lease expiration, some of that's being negotiated. The balance of that, the spaces we're getting back are warehouse and R&D spaces. So, those are -- that space we're marketing, we've got folks looking at that. It's possible that, some of those, one or two of those buildings gets converted, but we'll have to stay tuned.
When you talk about repositioning, that's more in the lines of what I think Joel or Peter talked about earlier, , for the Tech Square 200, where it's an existing laboratory building, but it's -- it's been single tenant for a while, and it's an opportunity to be able to market that space to multi-tenant. So, that's in terms of when we talk about repositioning, that's we're thinking of that as in the, quote, unquote, bad CapEx bucket. But again, we, if you look back over a long period of time, that the amount of CapEx has been relatively small.

Peter Moglia

Yeah, and just maybe a footnote on that. So, Apple is in the process of negotiating a renewal on the majority of the buildings, but they're giving back two of the buildings, which Marc highlighted. I think the good news is one is, I think eminently releasable as R&D, and the other is warehouse, which we do have a client who's actually very interested in that.
And, based on what we've seen in the market, there also could be some demand for data center activity there. So, we're not, necessarily, we had in our forward model, we had assumed this scenario that we would get back two buildings that weren't adjacent to their campus where their other buildings are, and that they would take those forward. And that's exactly how it played out, so.

Vikram Malhotra

Thanks so much.

Operator

James Kammert, Evercore.

James Kammert

Thank you. Apologies for a bit of a pedestrian math question, but you speak to 341,000 square feet or so of leasing activity and the development and redevelopment pipeline. But help me, where am I missing? If I go to page 37, the supplemental, and I kind of reconcile, the net change in lease square footage percentages from the prior quarter to the second quarter, I'm coming up a little shy of 340,000. So, I'm just trying, where am I missing, or where else should I look? Thank you.

Marc Binda

Hey, Jim. This is Marc. Yeah, you're right. There was actually one project that was already leased where the tenant actually came back to us to actually add on additional term. That project has not been finished yet, hasn't been completed. So, a bit of a conundrum where you put that.
But given that that project hasn't delivered, it's in the development pipeline. That's a project in San Diego. And we were happy to see that happen because we got an extra term out of it. So, that's the reason for that. That doesn't happen very often.

James Kammert

I see. So, it's basically almost a giveback, but then they came back with a longer requirement. So, we just can't see that. And it must be in the order of 100,000 square feet plus. Does that sound right?

Marc Binda

That's right.

James Kammert

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

Peter Abramowitz, Jefferies.

Peter Abramowitz

Thank you. Yes. Most of my questions have been answered, but just one other on the mix in leasing this quarter. Could you just comment on the leasing spreads? Was there anything kind of notable that stood out that dragged them down a little bit this quarter? I know you talked about how it can be lumpy, but just wondering if there's anything to call out there.

Joel Marcus

Yeah. The answer is no. And the mix of the different segments, whether it be product and device, multinational pharma, private biotech, all were actually pretty strong. And a mixture of those, public biotech was probably among the lowest. That's just how it works, given what we've said about the barbell.
But nothing. Don't read anything into if you look at first quarter was extremely strong. This quarter's more muted, but still pretty solid. And I think it kind of just is kind of down the middle of the fairway as we see it at this juncture.

Peter Abramowitz

Got it. Thanks, Joel. And then one other for me. I think you've talked about there's been a fair amount of activity and an increase in activity this year, sort of in that small to mid-sized tenant group. I guess as you look out into the market and the funding environment and the macro backdrop, any idea or sense of what you think it would take for kind of larger, those 100,000 square foot and up tenants to start to get more active?

Joel Marcus

Yeah, I'll ask Kelly to answer. Kind of the one thing that would make a huge difference would be the true opening of the IPO market, which signals that you've got long-term investors, crossover investors, and even earlier stage investors participating. The IPOs that have happened to date are kind of few and far between, and they've traded down on an average pretty substantially. So, that's one thing that would be very recognizable and has been something that has led some of the other bull markets. But, Hallie, you could comment more in depth.

Hallie Kuhn

Yeah, I would say taking a step back, generally those requirements, particularly from the public biotechnology tenants, are very milestone based. And that is irrespective of the macro environment, whether or not a clinical trial has positive or negative data, it doesn't matter what the interest rates are.
So, I would say historically, as we look at those types of requirements, it's just really dependent on companies hitting those inflection points. And we certainly have some of those types of requirements in the pipeline as data comes to fruition.
And there's been some other examples as well. [VAC] site's a good example. In our San Carlos campus, they've continued to expand off positive data. So, I would kind of shift the focus more towards, as these companies continue to show that they have value in their pipelines, that is really where the demand is driven from.

Peter Abramowitz

That's helpful. Thank you.

Operator

Dylan Brzezinski with Green Street

Dylan Brzezinski

Good afternoon, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Just sort of wanting to touch on retention here. I know historically, your guys' retention has typically been in, call it, the 75% to 80% range. But over the last six quarters, that started to trend down. I guess just curious, as we sort of look out over the next year or so, as the supply pipeline continues to deliver, should we expect that to continue to have an impact on your guys' retention?
And I guess just looking at the last six quarters, I mean, is there something else besides supply that is sort of driving that lower retention rate?

Joel Marcus

Yeah. So, Marc, do you have the stats on that?

Marc Binda

Yeah. Dylan, I think if you're just looking at renewals as a percentage of expirations, it's really hard to get the full picture. Case in point, you've got, as an example, you've got Moderna and Tech Square that we talked about, right, were a large space -- that they will not be renewing, right?
But what's missing is, right, they signed a 462,000 square-foot lease at a new development. So it's difficult just to take the retention rates right off the face of the leasing page. I mean, the way we look at it when we normalize for those sorts of things, we really haven't seen a drop-off in retention.

Dylan Brzezinski

Got it. And so I guess -- given the mission-critical nature of a life science facility, it seems like for those tenants, new supply, like simply upgrading your facility may not be worth it given the downtime and the risks associated with moving landlords. Is that fair to say?

Joel Marcus

Well, I think it's way more complicated than that. People in this industry don't move for a buck-a-foot difference. That's just not relevant. And also, the sponsorship of who they lease from is critical because there have been a number over the last year of significant failures of others in this industry where labs have been shut down and major damages happened to the science or the people in the laboratories.
So, operating with, the best of breed in the industry makes a big difference. We don't see anybody that's just going to move to a place for, some small difference. That just doesn't happen. And, if the tenants are decent, our mega-campus strategy is aimed at always having inventory to allow these companies to grow and to retain them. So, that's the big issue.
Supply isn't really the big issue now. Supply does impact, leasing in the sense that when somebody's looking at space, they could cite other locations. But if the locations aren't really, dead center comparable, then those comps don't really make a big difference. And people aren't going to pick up and leave for, as I say, , a few bucks cheaper rent. It just doesn't happen in this industry.

Dylan Brzezinski

That's helpful details. Thanks, guys.

Operator

Omotayo Okusanya, Deutsche Bank.

Omotayo Okusanya

Hi, yes. Good afternoon, everyone. I just wanted to focus on Boston a little bit. You do have a fair amount of leases that will be expiring in that market in the back half of this year and also in 2025. Trying to understand what's happening with market rents in those markets relative to your in-place rents as we kind of try to, estimate, guesstimate what mark to market could look like on a going forward basis.

Joel Marcus

Yeah. So, Marc, you could comment on overall mark to market, and Peter, you could give some observations if you want.

Marc Binda

Sure. Yeah. I mean, we talk about the in-place mark to market for our entire portfolio being about 12%. We typically don't break that down. Kind of market by market. But you're right. We do have a fair amount of space that's rolling.
The good news is a lot of that's in Cambridge, which if that's where you're getting space back, that's it's still a place where market rents have done pretty well. But Peter, maybe I'll let you comment specifically if you want on market rents there.

Peter Moglia

Yeah. We've been looking at a lot of data around where face rates are. And, Boston is -- and the rest of our large markets are pretty consistent where rents have come off the peaks of 2021, 2022, but they're still well above the pre-pandemic rates. Of course, you still have more concessions today in the form of TIs for the newly built space. But, we're pretty happy considering the supply dynamic that rents are still above the pre-pandemic levels.

Omotayo Okusanya

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Joel Marcus for any closing remarks.

Joel Marcus

I just want to wish everybody a safe and healthy summer, and we'll look forward to talking on our third quarter call. Thank you, everybody.

Operator

Thank you, sir. This concludes today's conference call. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.