Advertisement
Australia markets open in 2 hours 1 minute
  • ALL ORDS

    7,831.90
    -100.10 (-1.26%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6530
    +0.0051 (+0.78%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,569.90
    -94.20 (-1.23%)
     
  • OIL

    79.13
    +0.13 (+0.16%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,330.20
    +27.30 (+1.19%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    88,620.59
    -3,616.91 (-3.92%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,202.07
    -136.99 (-10.23%)
     

Party rounds are either the dinner party of your dreams or the one where no one shows up

Hello and welcome back to Equity, a podcast about the business of startups, where we unpack the numbers and nuance behind the headlines.

This is our Wednesday show, where we niche down to a single topic, think about a question and unpack the rest. This week, along with Alex's help, Natasha asked: Who should be raising party rounds?

The episode was inspired by Natasha’s recent Startups Weekly column, “When the party has confetti but no allergen-friendly appetizers" and the companion TechCrunch+ piece with Anita, “Investment clubs are cool again, and maybe community is, too.”

Here's what we got into:

ADVERTISEMENT
  • The definition of party rounds, boundaries and the fact that we don't entirely agree on if there needs to be a lead or nah.

  • How has party round funding changed? What place do they hold in the ecosystem?

  • Is this vehicle better for experienced founders versus first-time founders?

  • The pros and cons of each side.

Equity drops every Monday at 7 a.m. PDT and Wednesday and Friday at 6 a.m. PDT, so subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts.