Australia markets open in 3 hours 16 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,030.90
    +125.60 (+1.82%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6506
    +0.0002 (+0.03%)
     
  • ASX 200

    6,815.70
    +116.40 (+1.74%)
     
  • OIL

    87.81
    +1.29 (+1.49%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,725.90
    -4.60 (-0.27%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    31,043.59
    -55.64 (-0.18%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    458.14
    -0.27 (-0.06%)
     

Party rounds are either the dinner party of your dreams or the one where no one shows up

·1-min read

Hello and welcome back to Equity, a podcast about the business of startups, where we unpack the numbers and nuance behind the headlines.

This is our Wednesday show, where we niche down to a single topic, think about a question and unpack the rest. This week, along with Alex's help, Natasha asked: Who should be raising party rounds?

The episode was inspired by Natasha’s recent Startups Weekly column, “When the party has confetti but no allergen-friendly appetizers" and the companion TechCrunch+ piece with Anita, “Investment clubs are cool again, and maybe community is, too.”

Here's what we got into:

  • The definition of party rounds, boundaries and the fact that we don't entirely agree on if there needs to be a lead or nah.

  • How has party round funding changed? What place do they hold in the ecosystem?

  • Is this vehicle better for experienced founders versus first-time founders?

  • The pros and cons of each side.

Equity drops every Monday at 7 a.m. PDT and Wednesday and Friday at 6 a.m. PDT, so subscribe to us on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts.