While Google Glass' potential as a consumer device remains to be seen, Lauren Rubinson-Morris is excited about its possibilities in her workplace.
Rubinson-Morris is president and chief executive officer of MedEx Ambulance Service, an Illinois-based company that provides transportation to hospitals and other healthcare sites throughout the Chicago area.
The company has acquired two pairs of Google Glass installed with software and connected to the internet, allowing paramedics to transmit live video and audio from an ambulance to a doctor in an emergency room who will be able to watch the video stream on a tablet or desktop computer.
The additional eyes on a patient can provide paramedics with advice, diagnosis and treatment options. MedEx plans to launch a test with Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center in Chicago, Rubinson-Morris said.
MedEx is one of several US healthcare providers experimenting with Glass to see whether it can improve collaboration and patient outcomes while reducing costs. At Rhode Island Hospital, for instance, ER doctors are using Glass to consult with off-site dermatologists for patients with burns or rashes.
Virtual medical exams where doctors in distant locations evaluate patients online are proliferating. But video consultations have traditionally connected patients in rural areas to specialists at urban medical centres. Google Glass offers the potential to expand video interactions into all corners of the healthcare industry because it is mobile.
At $US1,500 ($A1,623) a pair, Glass is less expensive than some videoconferencing equipment used by hospitals that can cost $US10,000 to $US40,000. Those systems are a significant investment in technology for doctors and hospitals, said Dr Warren Wiechmann, associate dean of instructional technologies at the University of California at Irvine School of Medicine.
"By hospital equipment standards, Google Glass is a steal," Wiechmann said.
Dr Paul Porter, assistant professor of emergency medicine at Brown University in Rhode Island who is leading a Glass study at Rhode Island Hospital, agreed.
"It's a really low-cost way of entering the telemedicine world," Porter said. "I think this is promising technology because it allows physicians to engage with a patient at eye level. There's nothing more discouraging than seeing a physician looking at his computer typing while trying to talk to you."
Porter said that although the video-streaming software on Glass has worked with few glitches, he hasn't tested it in a fast-moving ambulance with sirens blaring. That's the big challenge for MedEx. In an emergency, paramedics and physicians can't afford blurry images or dropped wireless signals.
"We have to make sure the technology works," said Dr Eddie Markul, medical director for emergency medical services for the Chicago North EMS Region at Advocate Illinois Masonic.
"We don't want to have critical patients relying on technology that fails."