Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    8,070.10
    -9.10 (-0.11%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,822.30
    -9.50 (-0.12%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6752
    +0.0024 (+0.35%)
     
  • OIL

    83.44
    -0.44 (-0.52%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,399.80
    +30.40 (+1.28%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    85,462.58
    +1,795.73 (+2.15%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,194.06
    -14.63 (-1.21%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6227
    +0.0007 (+0.11%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0979
    -0.0013 (-0.12%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,794.81
    +48.15 (+0.41%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    20,391.97
    +205.33 (+1.02%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,203.93
    -37.33 (-0.45%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    39,375.87
    +67.87 (+0.17%)
     
  • DAX

    18,475.45
    +24.97 (+0.14%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,799.61
    -228.67 (-1.27%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,912.37
    -1.28 (-0.00%)
     

Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE:NUS) is largely controlled by institutional shareholders who own 80% of the company

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Nu Skin Enterprises implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders

  • Recent sales by insiders

If you want to know who really controls Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE:NUS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Nu Skin Enterprises.

View our latest analysis for Nu Skin Enterprises

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nu Skin Enterprises?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that Nu Skin Enterprises does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Nu Skin Enterprises, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Nu Skin Enterprises is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 17% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.1% of the company stock.

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Nu Skin Enterprises

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$545m, and insiders have US$11m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Nu Skin Enterprises. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Nu Skin Enterprises better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Nu Skin Enterprises you should know about.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com