Australia markets close in 4 hours 45 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,542.70
    -0.90 (-0.01%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,244.30
    +3.10 (+0.04%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.7009
    +0.0005 (+0.07%)
     
  • OIL

    67.77
    +1.51 (+2.28%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,785.70
    +1.80 (+0.10%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    69,842.23
    -1,425.94 (-2.00%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,367.14
    -74.62 (-5.18%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6200
    +0.0013 (+0.21%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0380
    +0.0009 (+0.08%)
     
  • NZX 50

    12,606.15
    -70.35 (-0.55%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,712.04
    -278.76 (-1.74%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,122.32
    -6.89 (-0.10%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    34,580.08
    -59.72 (-0.17%)
     
  • DAX

    15,169.98
    -93.12 (-0.61%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    23,766.69
    -22.21 (-0.09%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    28,020.17
    -9.40 (-0.03%)
     

How Much Of Stryve Foods, Inc. (NASDAQ:SNAX) Do Insiders Own?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

If you want to know who really controls Stryve Foods, Inc. (NASDAQ:SNAX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of US$169m, Stryve Foods is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have not yet purchased much of the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Stryve Foods.

See our latest analysis for Stryve Foods

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stryve Foods?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

Less than 5% of Stryve Foods is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Stryve Foods is not owned by hedge funds. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Stryve Foods' case, its Top Key Executive, Ted Casey, is the largest shareholder, holding 8.5% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.0% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Benjamin Luke Weil is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Joe Oblas directly holds 3.9% of the total shares outstanding.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 17 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Stryve Foods

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Stryve Foods, Inc.. Insiders have a US$35m stake in this US$169m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public holds a substantial 68% stake in Stryve Foods, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 7.1% stake in Stryve Foods. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Stryve Foods has 4 warning signs (and 2 which make us uncomfortable) we think you should know about.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting