Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    8,153.70
    +80.10 (+0.99%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,896.90
    +77.30 (+0.99%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6528
    -0.0008 (-0.12%)
     
  • OIL

    82.82
    +1.47 (+1.81%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,243.00
    +30.30 (+1.37%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    108,542.91
    +2,570.58 (+2.43%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6040
    +0.0010 (+0.16%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0902
    +0.0022 (+0.21%)
     
  • NZX 50

    12,105.29
    +94.63 (+0.79%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    18,259.69
    -21.15 (-0.12%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,959.93
    +27.95 (+0.35%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    39,762.90
    +2.82 (+0.01%)
     
  • DAX

    18,504.51
    +27.42 (+0.15%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,541.42
    +148.58 (+0.91%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,168.07
    -594.66 (-1.46%)
     

Report: There are more than 1 billion reasons why MLB let Nike put the swoosh on its uniforms

Nike’s swoosh has officially landed on the front of every Major League Baseball team’s uniforms, and many of the league’s fans are predictably not happy about it.

Uniforms that have gone unchanged for decades, like the New York Yankees and Los Angeles Dodgers, now feature that little swoosh on the right breast, rather than on the sleeve like Majestic when it was the league’s uniform supplier. It is the first time a manufacturer’s logo has reached the front of MLB’s uniforms.

It’s a jarring sight at first. It also raises the question of just how many truckloads of money Nike must have handed to MLB for the league to agree to the placement. The answer, unsurprisingly, is quite a bit of money. But that’s not all.

Why is the Nike swoosh on the front of every MLB uniform?

According to Andrew Marchand of the New York Post, the 10-year deal between MLB, Nike and retailer Fanatics is valued at more than $1 billion over 10 years. Even at its minimum, that works out to over $3 million per team per year, for a patch only a few inches long.

ADVERTISEMENT

That might sound somewhat lower than you’d think, but a Fanatics executive told Marchand that there was more than just a financial reason to add the swoosh:

“Demand is up significantly based on adding the swoosh to the uniform and is bringing in younger consumers to the sport and a marketing halo from Nike,” Michael Rubin, the founder and executive chairman of Fanatics, told The Post.

The young people apparently love the swoosh, according to one of the people at the center of the deal to add the swoosh. Take that for what you will.

This is the second time in the past few years MLB has allowed a manufacturer to add its logo to a prominent part of its uniforms, as hat-maker New Era has featured its logo on the side of all official caps since the 2016 playoffs.

As much as purists have decried the swoosh, this might only be a warm-up for teams potentially adding jersey sponsors, which could reportedly happen as early as 2022. Teams including the Yankees and Boston Red Sox have already sported advertising patches and more in games played overseas, so it could only be a matter of time.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - DECEMBER 18: Gerrit Cole and Manager, Aaron Boone of the New York Yankees pose for a photo at Yankee Stadium during a press conference at Yankee Stadium on December 18, 2019  in New York City. (Photo by Mike Stobe/Getty Images)
Gerrit Cole is a New York Yankee. His uniform will look different than the ones he grew up watching. (Photo by Mike Stobe/Getty Images)

More from Yahoo Sports: