Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,288.80
    -36.60 (-0.50%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,032.50
    -38.50 (-0.54%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.7125
    +0.0017 (+0.24%)
     
  • OIL

    91.88
    -2.46 (-2.61%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,818.90
    +11.70 (+0.65%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    34,317.07
    +711.70 (+2.12%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    574.64
    +3.36 (+0.59%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6940
    +0.0061 (+0.89%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.1028
    -0.0019 (-0.17%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,730.52
    -29.49 (-0.25%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    13,565.87
    +273.89 (+2.06%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,500.89
    +34.98 (+0.47%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    33,761.05
    +424.38 (+1.27%)
     
  • DAX

    13,795.85
    +101.34 (+0.74%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    20,175.62
    +93.19 (+0.46%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    28,546.98
    +727.65 (+2.62%)
     

How Many Pilbara Minerals Limited (ASX:PLS) Shares Do Institutions Own?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Every investor in Pilbara Minerals Limited (ASX:PLS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

Pilbara Minerals is a pretty big company. It has a market capitalization of AU$6.0b. Normally institutions would own a significant portion of a company this size. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions own shares in the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pilbara Minerals.

View our latest analysis for Pilbara Minerals

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pilbara Minerals?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pilbara Minerals. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pilbara Minerals' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pilbara Minerals. The company's largest shareholder is AustralianSuper Pty. Ltd., with ownership of 7.1%. With 6.2% and 5.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited and Ganfeng Lithium Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Pilbara Minerals

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Pilbara Minerals Limited. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own AU$49m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public collectively holds 60% of Pilbara Minerals shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 4.5%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Public Company Ownership

Public companies currently own 11% of Pilbara Minerals stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Pilbara Minerals better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Pilbara Minerals that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting