Australia markets close in 2 hours 39 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,382.70
    +79.40 (+1.09%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,138.70
    +74.20 (+1.05%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.7017
    -0.0032 (-0.45%)
     
  • OIL

    110.98
    -1.23 (-1.10%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,838.20
    -3.00 (-0.16%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    43,047.21
    +1,203.23 (+2.88%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    673.09
    +20.85 (+3.20%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6641
    -0.0016 (-0.24%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.1011
    -0.0026 (-0.24%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,259.64
    +52.71 (+0.47%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    11,875.63
    -52.69 (-0.44%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,302.74
    -135.35 (-1.82%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    31,253.13
    -236.94 (-0.75%)
     
  • DAX

    13,882.30
    -125.46 (-0.90%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    20,482.95
    +362.27 (+1.80%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    26,712.36
    +309.52 (+1.17%)
     

What You Need To Know About Prospa Group Limited's (ASX:PGL) Investor Composition

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

If you want to know who really controls Prospa Group Limited (ASX:PGL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

With a market capitalization of AU$139m, Prospa Group is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions own shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Prospa Group.

Check out our latest analysis for Prospa Group

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Prospa Group?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Prospa Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Prospa Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Prospa Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Martin Moshal with 32% of shares outstanding. Gregory Moshal is the second largest shareholder owning 15% of common stock, and Airtree Ventures Gp Pty Ltd holds about 9.0% of the company stock. Gregory Moshal, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

Insider Ownership Of Prospa Group

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems that insiders own more than half the Prospa Group Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a AU$80m stake in this AU$139m business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Prospa Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 21%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Prospa Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Prospa Group .

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting