Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,543.60
    +7.50 (+0.10%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,241.20
    +16.00 (+0.22%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.7004
    -0.0090 (-1.27%)
     
  • OIL

    66.22
    -0.28 (-0.42%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,782.10
    +21.40 (+1.22%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    70,047.16
    -8,595.95 (-10.93%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,367.14
    -74.62 (-5.18%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6187
    -0.0087 (-1.39%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0371
    -0.0028 (-0.27%)
     
  • NZX 50

    12,676.50
    +6.26 (+0.05%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    15,712.04
    -278.72 (-1.74%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,122.32
    -6.89 (-0.10%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    34,580.08
    -59.71 (-0.17%)
     
  • DAX

    15,169.98
    -93.13 (-0.61%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    23,766.69
    -22.24 (-0.09%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    28,029.57
    +276.20 (+1.00%)
     

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In Alumina Limited's (ASX:AWC) Shares?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

The big shareholder groups in Alumina Limited (ASX:AWC) have power over the company. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.

With a market capitalization of AU$5.9b, Alumina is rather large. We'd expect to see institutional investors on the register. Companies of this size are usually well known to retail investors, too. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions own shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Alumina.

Check out our latest analysis for Alumina

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alumina?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

We can see that Alumina does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Alumina, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Alumina. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is CITIC Group Corporation with 19% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 6.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Orbis Investment Management Limited and Schroder Investment Management Limited are the second and third largest shareholders.

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Alumina

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that Alumina Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own AU$27m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public, with a 36% stake in the company, will not easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 19%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Alumina better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Alumina that you should be aware of before investing here.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting