Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    6,720.40
    -26.10 (-0.39%)
     
  • ASX 200

    6,539.90
    -28.20 (-0.43%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6818
    -0.0086 (-1.25%)
     
  • OIL

    108.30
    +2.54 (+2.40%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,808.70
    +1.40 (+0.08%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    28,349.40
    +375.02 (+1.34%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    416.43
    -3.71 (-0.88%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6536
    -0.0045 (-0.69%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0978
    -0.0072 (-0.65%)
     
  • NZX 50

    10,753.16
    -115.54 (-1.06%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    11,587.49
    +83.77 (+0.73%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,168.65
    -0.63 (-0.01%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    31,120.45
    +345.02 (+1.12%)
     
  • DAX

    12,813.03
    +29.26 (+0.23%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    21,859.79
    -137.10 (-0.62%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    25,935.62
    -457.42 (-1.73%)
     

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of Magnetic Resources NL (ASX:MAU)?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

A look at the shareholders of Magnetic Resources NL (ASX:MAU) can tell us which group is most powerful. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

Magnetic Resources is a smaller company with a market capitalization of AU$325m, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions don't own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Magnetic Resources.

View our latest analysis for Magnetic Resources

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Magnetic Resources?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Magnetic Resources' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Magnetic Resources is not owned by hedge funds. Chimseng Oan is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 6.7% of the stock. In addition, we found that George Sakalidis, the CEO has 3.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

Insider Ownership Of Magnetic Resources

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Magnetic Resources NL. Insiders have a AU$156m stake in this AU$325m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 23%, of the Magnetic Resources stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Magnetic Resources better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Magnetic Resources (of which 3 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting