Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    6,976.10
    -57.40 (-0.82%)
     
  • ASX 200

    6,762.80
    -54.70 (-0.80%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6371
    -0.0044 (-0.68%)
     
  • OIL

    93.20
    +4.75 (+5.37%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,701.80
    -19.00 (-1.10%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    30,721.37
    -758.88 (-2.41%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    445.50
    -9.53 (-2.09%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6536
    -0.0005 (-0.07%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.1356
    +0.0037 (+0.33%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,103.79
    -21.45 (-0.19%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    11,039.47
    -446.03 (-3.88%)
     
  • FTSE

    6,991.09
    -6.18 (-0.09%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    29,296.79
    -630.15 (-2.11%)
     
  • DAX

    12,273.00
    -197.78 (-1.59%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,740.05
    -272.10 (-1.51%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    27,116.11
    -195.19 (-0.71%)
     

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of Cronos Australia Limited (ASX:CAU)?

·5-min read

If you want to know who really controls Cronos Australia Limited (ASX:CAU), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

With a market capitalization of AU$160m, Cronos Australia is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions are not really that prevalent on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Cronos Australia.

See our latest analysis for Cronos Australia

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cronos Australia?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Cronos Australia, for yourself, below.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Cronos Australia. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Cronos Australia's case, its Senior Key Executive, Benjamin David Jansen, is the largest shareholder, holding 24% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 23% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 10% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Guy Headley is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders. In addition, we found that Rodney Cocks, the CEO has 3.6% of the shares allocated to their name.

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of Cronos Australia

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Cronos Australia Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a AU$88m stake in this AU$160m business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cronos Australia. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 11%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Public Company Ownership

Public companies currently own 10% of Cronos Australia stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Cronos Australia you should be aware of, and 2 of them can't be ignored.

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.