Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    6,720.40
    -26.10 (-0.39%)
     
  • ASX 200

    6,539.90
    -28.20 (-0.43%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6818
    -0.0087 (-1.25%)
     
  • OIL

    108.46
    +2.70 (+2.55%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,812.90
    +5.60 (+0.31%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    28,189.66
    -289.80 (-1.02%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    420.84
    +0.70 (+0.17%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6533
    -0.0048 (-0.73%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0973
    -0.0077 (-0.70%)
     
  • NZX 50

    10,753.16
    -115.54 (-1.06%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    11,585.68
    +81.96 (+0.71%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,168.65
    -0.63 (-0.01%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    31,097.26
    +321.83 (+1.05%)
     
  • DAX

    12,813.03
    +29.26 (+0.23%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    21,859.79
    -137.10 (-0.62%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    25,935.62
    -457.42 (-1.73%)
     

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of APM Human Services International Limited (ASX:APM)?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·5-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

The big shareholder groups in APM Human Services International Limited (ASX:APM) have power over the company. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of AU$2.9b, APM Human Services International is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about APM Human Services International.

View our latest analysis for APM Human Services International

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About APM Human Services International?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that APM Human Services International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see APM Human Services International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

APM Human Services International is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC is the largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. Megan Wynne is the second largest shareholder owning 23% of common stock, and Bellinge Holdings Pty Ltd holds about 11% of the company stock. Megan Wynne, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive. Additionally, the company's CEO Michael Anghie directly holds 2.3% of the total shares outstanding.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of APM Human Services International

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of APM Human Services International Limited. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful AU$852m stake in this AU$2.9b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over APM Human Services International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 29%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the APM Human Services International stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand APM Human Services International better, we need to consider many other factors.

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting