Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,391.00
    +87.70 (+1.20%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,145.60
    +81.10 (+1.15%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.7037
    -0.0012 (-0.17%)
     
  • OIL

    112.70
    +0.49 (+0.44%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,845.10
    +3.90 (+0.21%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    41,389.49
    -2,155.95 (-4.95%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    650.34
    -23.03 (-3.42%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6659
    +0.0002 (+0.03%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0973
    -0.0065 (-0.59%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,267.39
    +60.46 (+0.54%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    11,835.62
    -40.01 (-0.34%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,389.98
    +87.24 (+1.19%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    31,261.90
    +8.77 (+0.03%)
     
  • DAX

    13,981.91
    +99.61 (+0.72%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    20,717.24
    +596.56 (+2.96%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    26,739.03
    +336.19 (+1.27%)
     

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of AFT Pharmaceuticals Limited (NZSE:AFT)?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

If you want to know who really controls AFT Pharmaceuticals Limited (NZSE:AFT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

AFT Pharmaceuticals is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of NZ$459m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about AFT Pharmaceuticals.

View our latest analysis for AFT Pharmaceuticals

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AFT Pharmaceuticals?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AFT Pharmaceuticals. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see AFT Pharmaceuticals' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

AFT Pharmaceuticals is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Hartley Atkinson with 70% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have significant control over the outcome or future of the company, which is why insider ownership is usually looked upon favourably by prospective buyers. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.2% and 2.7% of the stock.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of AFT Pharmaceuticals

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of AFT Pharmaceuticals Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of NZ$459m, that means they have NZ$323m worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with AFT Pharmaceuticals , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting