Advertisement
Australia markets close in 3 hours 52 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,893.60
    +32.60 (+0.41%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,637.60
    +32.00 (+0.42%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6450
    +0.0013 (+0.20%)
     
  • OIL

    82.80
    +0.11 (+0.13%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,383.90
    -4.50 (-0.19%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    95,477.15
    -3,731.59 (-3.76%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6040
    +0.0013 (+0.22%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0886
    +0.0013 (+0.12%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,785.62
    -89.73 (-0.76%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,493.62
    -220.04 (-1.24%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,847.99
    +27.63 (+0.35%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    37,753.31
    -45.66 (-0.12%)
     
  • DAX

    17,770.02
    +3.79 (+0.02%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,335.89
    +84.05 (+0.52%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,955.56
    -6.24 (-0.02%)
     

Do Institutions Own PerkinElmer, Inc. (NYSE:PKI) Shares?

If you want to know who really controls PerkinElmer, Inc. (NYSE:PKI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.

PerkinElmer is a pretty big company. It has a market capitalization of US$21b. Normally institutions would own a significant portion of a company this size. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about PerkinElmer.

See our latest analysis for PerkinElmer

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PerkinElmer?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

ADVERTISEMENT

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PerkinElmer. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see PerkinElmer's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 7.0% of PerkinElmer shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 10%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of PerkinElmer

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of PerkinElmer, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$164m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public holds a 12% stake in PerkinElmer. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand PerkinElmer better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for PerkinElmer (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.