Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    8,013.80
    +11.00 (+0.14%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,767.50
    +7.90 (+0.10%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6654
    +0.0003 (+0.04%)
     
  • OIL

    82.69
    +0.95 (+1.16%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,338.50
    +1.90 (+0.08%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    92,197.22
    +482.59 (+0.53%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,279.90
    -3.93 (-0.31%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6214
    +0.0009 (+0.14%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0945
    +0.0018 (+0.16%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,717.43
    -117.59 (-0.99%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    19,789.03
    +37.98 (+0.19%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,220.61
    +40.93 (+0.50%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    39,164.06
    +36.26 (+0.09%)
     
  • DAX

    18,318.73
    +108.18 (+0.59%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,718.61
    +2.14 (+0.01%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,583.08
    +241.54 (+0.61%)
     

Insiders own 27% of Ensign Energy Services Inc. (TSE:ESI) shares but retail investors control 57% of the company

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Ensign Energy Services indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 44% ownership

  • Insiders have bought recently

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ensign Energy Services Inc. (TSE:ESI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 57% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

And individual insiders on the other hand have a 27% ownership in the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ensign Energy Services, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Ensign Energy Services

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ensign Energy Services?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Ensign Energy Services does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ensign Energy Services' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Ensign Energy Services is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Norman Edwards with 23% of shares outstanding. Zenith Insurance Company is the second largest shareholder owning 4.3% of common stock, and Hamblin Watsa Investment Counsel Ltd. holds about 3.1% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Robert Geddes, the CEO has 1.0% of the shares allocated to their name.

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Ensign Energy Services

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Ensign Energy Services Inc.. Insiders own CA$114m worth of shares in the CA$417m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 57% stake in Ensign Energy Services, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 5.9%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Ensign Energy Services you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.