Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,817.40
    -81.50 (-1.03%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,567.30
    -74.80 (-0.98%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6421
    -0.0004 (-0.07%)
     
  • OIL

    83.24
    +0.51 (+0.62%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,406.70
    +8.70 (+0.36%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    99,237.59
    -1,614.62 (-1.60%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,371.97
    +59.34 (+4.52%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6023
    -0.0008 (-0.13%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0893
    +0.0018 (+0.17%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,796.21
    -39.83 (-0.34%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,037.65
    -356.67 (-2.05%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,895.85
    +18.80 (+0.24%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    37,986.40
    +211.02 (+0.56%)
     
  • DAX

    17,737.36
    -100.04 (-0.56%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,224.14
    -161.73 (-0.99%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,068.35
    -1,011.35 (-2.66%)
     

How many new dwellings will Victoria need?


By Michael Yardney

The recently revised Plan Melbourne forecasts the population of Melbourne is projected to grow from 4.5 million to almost 8 million, with Victoria’s total population set to top 10 million by 2051.

Of course this will create some interesting social and infrastructure challenges.

For example, the city’s transport network will need to cater for around 10 million more trips a day – an increase of more than 80%

And we’ll need to create another 1.5 million jobs for the changing workforce.

As it grows, Melbourne will also need to protect its liveability and sense of community which has ranked it the world’s most liveable city for the last six years in a row.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the same time Melbourne will need to build another 1.6 million homes, but more importantly we’ll need to build the type of property people want to live in, in locations where people want to live.

Fortunately Plan Victoria recognises that this new housing needs to be well planned, affordable and in the right places, close to jobs and services.

Also read: These economic ‘black swans’ could rock global markets

However, this means up to 70 per cent of these new dwellings will need be built in existing suburbs (up from the current projection of 65 per cent) in an effort to create “20-minute” neighbourhoods with access to public transport and services.

And that’s where planners will be at loggerheads with the anti-development N.I.M.B.Y. groups.

You know the ones… “Yes we want our city to grow but Not In My Back Yard!”

Victoria’s Andrews government plans to raise height limits and allow more dense new developments in Melbourne’s middle ring suburbs.

“The reason we need to have increased density is because a lot of the services and much of the amenity is located in our well-established suburbs,” Planning Minister Richard Wynne told The Australian Financial Review.

Also read: Smart tax moves for those looking to retire

This means we’re in for some interesting times as groups such as Save Our Suburbs are likely to oppose the planned changes.

While densification has occurred in Melbourne’s inner suburbs, the middle ring of suburbs (those between 5km and 20km from the CBD) have seen almost no growth in density over the past 30 years due to the efforts of the N.I.M.B.Y baby boomers forcing millennials to the urban fringes.

Source: Grattan Institute

But it’s actually in these middle ring suburbs with their amenity, desirable schools, good public transport and social infrastructure such as parks where our town planners hope to accommodate the bulk of our population growth.

Watch out – there’s going to be many more of those “WE OPPOSE INAPPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT” signs on the fences in Melbourne’s leafy suburbs over the next few years.

Michael Yardney is a director of Metropole Property Strategists, which creates wealth for its clients through independent, unbiased property advice and advocacy. He is a best-selling author, one of Australia’s leading experts in wealth creation through property and writes the Property Update blog.