Advertisement
Australia markets close in 3 hours 19 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,903.50
    +42.50 (+0.54%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,647.60
    +42.00 (+0.55%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6454
    +0.0017 (+0.26%)
     
  • OIL

    82.86
    +0.17 (+0.21%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,387.80
    -0.60 (-0.03%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    95,419.88
    -3,419.40 (-3.46%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6041
    +0.0015 (+0.25%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0887
    +0.0014 (+0.13%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,796.51
    -78.84 (-0.66%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,493.62
    -220.04 (-1.24%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,847.99
    +27.63 (+0.35%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    37,753.31
    -45.66 (-0.12%)
     
  • DAX

    17,770.02
    +3.79 (+0.02%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,446.99
    +195.15 (+1.20%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,090.87
    +129.07 (+0.34%)
     

Here's What Global Lithium Resources Limited's (ASX:GL1) Shareholder Ownership Structure Looks Like

The big shareholder groups in Global Lithium Resources Limited (ASX:GL1) have power over the company. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

Global Lithium Resources is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of AU$308m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have not yet purchased much of the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Global Lithium Resources.

Check out our latest analysis for Global Lithium Resources

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Global Lithium Resources?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Less than 5% of Global Lithium Resources is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Global Lithium Resources. Our data shows that Suzhou TA&A ultra clean technology Co.,Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 8.3% of shares outstanding. Guo Yongfang is the second largest shareholder owning 8.0% of common stock, and Goldenstar Energy Pty Ltd holds about 7.2% of the company stock.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

Insider Ownership Of Global Lithium Resources

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Global Lithium Resources Limited. Insiders have a AU$78m stake in this AU$308m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 15%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 17% of the Global Lithium Resources shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Global Lithium Resources (of which 3 make us uncomfortable!) you should know about.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.