Advertisement
Australia markets close in 13 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,987.20
    -26.60 (-0.33%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,746.40
    -21.10 (-0.27%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6667
    -0.0002 (-0.03%)
     
  • OIL

    81.99
    +0.45 (+0.55%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,329.40
    -10.20 (-0.44%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    95,029.59
    +3,993.34 (+4.39%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,314.14
    +30.31 (+2.36%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6197
    -0.0024 (-0.39%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0932
    -0.0008 (-0.07%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,789.39
    +71.96 (+0.61%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    19,682.87
    -106.13 (-0.54%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,164.12
    -15.56 (-0.19%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    39,118.86
    -45.24 (-0.12%)
     
  • DAX

    18,235.45
    +24.85 (+0.14%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,718.61
    +2.11 (+0.01%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,578.28
    -4.80 (-0.01%)
     

Element Fleet Management Corp.'s (TSE:EFN) institutional investors lost 4.6% over the past week but have profited from longer-term gains

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Element Fleet Management implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • A total of 21 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership

  • Insiders have been selling lately

If you want to know who really controls Element Fleet Management Corp. (TSE:EFN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.6% last week. However, the 20% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Element Fleet Management.

Check out our latest analysis for Element Fleet Management

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Element Fleet Management?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Element Fleet Management does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Element Fleet Management's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Element Fleet Management. The company's largest shareholder is T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., with ownership of 10%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.9% and 3.9% of the stock.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 21 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Element Fleet Management

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Element Fleet Management Corp. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CA$13m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 42% stake in Element Fleet Management. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Element Fleet Management (1 is a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com