Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    7,937.50
    -0.40 (-0.01%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,683.00
    -0.50 (-0.01%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6504
    +0.0004 (+0.06%)
     
  • OIL

    82.88
    +0.07 (+0.08%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,325.80
    -12.60 (-0.54%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    98,795.59
    -3,672.16 (-3.58%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,390.99
    -33.11 (-2.32%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6073
    +0.0003 (+0.04%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0948
    +0.0006 (+0.05%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,946.43
    +143.15 (+1.21%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,526.80
    +55.33 (+0.32%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,040.38
    -4.43 (-0.06%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    38,460.92
    -42.77 (-0.11%)
     
  • DAX

    18,088.70
    -48.95 (-0.27%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,279.10
    +77.83 (+0.45%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,707.47
    -752.61 (-1.96%)
     

Why eating at a Chinese restaurant can help you negotiate better

Image: Getty
Image: Getty

It’s generally accepted that growing up with siblings can make you a better negotiator, but new research indicates that family-style eating can also reap similar rewards.

A new study from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business has revealed the benefits of sharing a family-style, or shared-plate, meal with your business counterparts when trying to negotiate a deal.

The research, published in Science Daily, found sharing a plate, rather than a meal leads to better collaboration, and helps business-people reach deals faster.

“Sharing plates is customary in Chinese and Indian cultures, among others. Because the custom requires people to coordinate their physical actions, it might in turn prompt them to coordinate their negotiations,” researchers Ayelet Fishbach and Kaitlin Woolley hypothesised.

The experiment

The researchers asked study participants to pair off in a lab experiment that involved negotiating. One person pretended to be a management representative and the other a union representative, with a goal of reaching a solution within 22 rounds on negotiation. There was a hypothetical union strike scheduled for the third round of negotiation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The participants had a snack of chips and salsa.

One half of the pairs received a bowl of chips and salsa to share, while the other half had their own bowls.

The results

Teams with shared bowls took nine rounds to reach a conclusion, while those with separate bowls took four rounds longer.

“This difference translated into significant dollar values, saving both parties a combined, if hypothetical, $1.5 million in losses,” the research found.

And the results had less to do with how the people felt about each other, but how well they coordinated their eating.

They arrived at this finding by asking friends to negotiate. Naturally, friends arrived at a resolution faster. But sharing plates had a significant effect for both strangers and friends.

The message?

Fishbach said that while technology helps us conduct meetings remotely, the value of conducting an in-person meeting over a meal can’t be ignored.

“Basically, every meal that you’re eating alone is a missed opportunity to connect to someone,” says Fishbach.

“And every meal that involves food sharing fully utilises the opportunity to create that social bond.”

Make your money work with Yahoo Finance’s daily newsletter. Sign up here and stay on top of the latest money, news and tech news.

Now read: Companies are desperate to find people with these 10 skills, according to LinkedIn

Now read: 14 business books everyone will be reading in 2019

Now read: Most people believe 6 myths about millionaires, and it can keep them from building their own wealth