Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    6,865.30
    +18.00 (+0.26%)
     
  • ASX 200

    6,634.10
    +18.80 (+0.28%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.7439
    -0.0001 (-0.01%)
     
  • OIL

    46.11
    +0.47 (+1.03%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,837.60
    -3.50 (-0.19%)
     
  • BTC-AUD

    25,501.65
    -395.46 (-1.53%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    371.80
    -7.45 (-1.96%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6123
    +0.0002 (+0.03%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0563
    +0.0052 (+0.49%)
     
  • NZX 50

    12,631.38
    -17.53 (-0.14%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    12,524.44
    +57.31 (+0.46%)
     
  • FTSE

    6,550.23
    +59.96 (+0.92%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    30,138.05
    +168.53 (+0.56%)
     
  • DAX

    13,298.96
    +46.10 (+0.35%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    26,835.92
    +107.42 (+0.40%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    26,751.24
    -58.13 (-0.22%)
     

Could The Ramelius Resources Limited (ASX:RMS) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

Simply Wall St
·5-min read

If you want to know who really controls Ramelius Resources Limited (ASX:RMS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.

Ramelius Resources isn't enormous, but it's not particularly small either. It has a market capitalization of AU$1.7b, which means it would generally expect to see some institutions on the share registry. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions own shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Ramelius Resources.

See our latest analysis for Ramelius Resources

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ramelius Resources?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ramelius Resources. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ramelius Resources' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ramelius Resources. Our data shows that Van Eck Associates Corporation is the largest shareholder with 9.7% of shares outstanding. Ruffer LLP is the second largest shareholder owning 6.8% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.3% of the company stock.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Ramelius Resources

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Ramelius Resources Limited. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own AU$26m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, mostly retail investors, hold a substantial 54% stake in Ramelius Resources, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this size of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to decline an acquisition or merger that may not improve profitability.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 3.2%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Ramelius Resources that you should be aware of.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.