Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    8,153.70
    +80.10 (+0.99%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,896.90
    +77.30 (+0.99%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6520
    -0.0016 (-0.24%)
     
  • OIL

    82.99
    +1.64 (+2.02%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,241.60
    +28.90 (+1.31%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    108,616.23
    +3,203.80 (+3.04%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6037
    +0.0007 (+0.11%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0902
    +0.0022 (+0.20%)
     
  • NZX 50

    12,105.29
    +94.63 (+0.79%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    18,240.22
    -40.62 (-0.22%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,952.62
    +20.64 (+0.26%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    39,790.03
    +29.95 (+0.08%)
     
  • DAX

    18,492.49
    +15.40 (+0.08%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,541.42
    +148.58 (+0.91%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,168.07
    -594.66 (-1.46%)
     

Didi Global denies media report it plans to go private after $4.4 billion New York IPO

(Reuters) -Ride-hailing company Didi Global on Thursday denied a media report that the company was considering going private to placate Chinese authorities and compensate investor losses since it listed in the United States.

The Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the matter, reported that the Chinese company has been mulling delisting plans as a crackdown in China widens and it has received support from cybersecurity regulators.

Didi, which listed in New York last month after raising $4.4 billion in an initial public offering (IPO), said in a statement that the WSJ report was not true.

"The company affirms that the above information is not true," it said, in reference to the report. "The company is fully cooperating with the relevant government authorities in China in the cybersecurity review of the company."

ADVERTISEMENT

Shares in Didi jumped as much as 40% in premarket trade on news of the WSJ report, but pared gains when trading opened on Wall Street. Didi rose 11.2% from Wednesday to close at $9.86 a share, but is down 29.6% from its listing price on June 30.

Days after Didi's market debut, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) launched an investigation into the company and asked it to stop registering new users, citing national security and the public interest.

The regulator also said it would remove the mobile apps operated by Didi from app stores.

Didi's listing was the biggest stock sale by a Chinese company since the 2014 listing of e-commerce behemoth Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.

The action against Didi came close on the heels of a month-long regulatory crackdown on China's massive internet sector for antitrust, customer data privacy and other violations, which has rattled investors.

Beijing said earlier this month that officials from at least seven departments, including the CAC, Ministry of Transport, and State Administration for Market Regulation (SMAR) were conducting an on-site cybersecurity review of Didi.

The CAC had been looking into whether there is a possibility of some of the company's data ending up in the hands of a foreign entity given Beijing's sensitivity about usage of onshore data, sources have told Reuters.

Didi has been in talks with bankers, regulators and key investors to try to resolve the problems following its listing on the New York Stock Exchange, the WSJ report said. (https://on.wsj.com/3ybFu4h)

The WSJ reported that Didi had asked its major underwriters to assess investors' views regarding a privatisation plan, as well as the pricing range that they would accept.

A take-private deal that would involve a tender offer for its publicly traded shares is one of the preliminary options being considered, the WSJ report said.

Chinese companies have been under increasing U.S. scrutiny.

A commissioner with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said on Monday that U.S.-listed Chinese companies must disclose the risks of Chinese government interference in their business as part of their regular reporting obligations.

The SEC in March adopted measures that would kick foreign companies off American stock exchanges if they do not comply with U.S. auditing standards. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has long complained about its lack of access in China.

(Reporting by Herbert Lash in New York, Chavi Mehta and Eva Mathews in Bengaluru, Yilei Sun in Beijing; Writing by Sumeet Chatterjee; Editing by Arun Koyyur, Jane Merriman, Carmel Crimmins and Marguerita Choy)