Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    8,323.50
    +30.40 (+0.37%)
     
  • ASX 200

    8,099.90
    +24.20 (+0.30%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6706
    -0.0018 (-0.26%)
     
  • OIL

    69.24
    +0.27 (+0.39%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,606.20
    +25.60 (+0.99%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    89,977.06
    +3,679.33 (+4.26%)
     
  • XRP AUD

    0.86
    +0.01 (+1.71%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6051
    -0.0016 (-0.26%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0884
    +0.0014 (+0.13%)
     
  • NZX 50

    12,832.55
    +12.27 (+0.10%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    19,514.58
    +91.52 (+0.47%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,273.09
    +32.12 (+0.39%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    41,393.78
    +297.01 (+0.72%)
     
  • DAX

    18,699.40
    +181.01 (+0.98%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,369.09
    +128.70 (+0.75%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    36,581.76
    -251.51 (-0.68%)
     

Beyond Meat, Inc. (NASDAQ:BYND) is definitely on the radar of institutional investors who own 48% of the company

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Beyond Meat's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • 45% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

Every investor in Beyond Meat, Inc. (NASDAQ:BYND) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Beyond Meat.

See our latest analysis for Beyond Meat

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Beyond Meat?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Beyond Meat. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Beyond Meat's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Beyond Meat. The company's largest shareholder is Parkwood Corporation, Asset Management Arm, with ownership of 8.3%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.2% and 7.0% of the stock. In addition, we found that Ethan Brown, the CEO has 2.3% of the shares allocated to their name.

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Beyond Meat

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

We can see that insiders own shares in Beyond Meat, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$391m, and insiders have US$19m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 47% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Beyond Meat. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Beyond Meat you should be aware of, and 1 of them makes us a bit uncomfortable.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com