Advertisement
Australia markets closed
  • ALL ORDS

    8,002.80
    -20.10 (-0.25%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6668
    +0.0016 (+0.24%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,759.60
    -23.40 (-0.30%)
     
  • OIL

    80.80
    -0.10 (-0.12%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,312.40
    -0.80 (-0.03%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    91,081.84
    -1,358.59 (-1.47%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,262.12
    -4.02 (-0.32%)
     

With 32% stake, RADCOM Ltd. (NASDAQ:RDCM) seems to have captured institutional investors' interest

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, RADCOM's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership

  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

If you want to know who really controls RADCOM Ltd. (NASDAQ:RDCM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 32% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of RADCOM, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for RADCOM

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RADCOM?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

RADCOM already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of RADCOM, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 20% of RADCOM. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Estate of Zohar Zisapel with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 7.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 54% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of RADCOM

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in RADCOM Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$5.5m worth of the US$140m company. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in RADCOM. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 17%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand RADCOM better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with RADCOM .

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com