Advertisement
Australia markets close in 4 hours 17 minutes
  • ALL ORDS

    7,788.80
    -110.10 (-1.39%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,532.60
    -109.50 (-1.43%)
     
  • AUD/USD

    0.6387
    -0.0039 (-0.60%)
     
  • OIL

    85.50
    +2.77 (+3.35%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,428.70
    +30.70 (+1.28%)
     
  • Bitcoin AUD

    96,020.96
    -385.82 (-0.40%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,268.99
    +383.45 (+41.32%)
     
  • AUD/EUR

    0.6007
    -0.0024 (-0.39%)
     
  • AUD/NZD

    1.0873
    -0.0002 (-0.02%)
     
  • NZX 50

    11,785.57
    -50.47 (-0.43%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,394.31
    -99.31 (-0.57%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,877.05
    +29.06 (+0.37%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    37,775.38
    +22.07 (+0.06%)
     
  • DAX

    17,837.40
    +67.38 (+0.38%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    16,112.85
    -273.02 (-1.67%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    36,921.45
    -1,158.25 (-3.04%)
     
Engadget
Why you can trust us

Engadget has been testing and reviewing consumer tech since 2004. Our stories may include affiliate links; if you buy something through a link, we may earn a commission. Read more about how we evaluate products.

Facebook may restrict highly targeted political ads

It would increase the minimum target size.

Facebook may be reluctant to overhaul key parts of its political ad policies, but it appears willing to make a few changes to stop the spread of misinformation. Wall Street Journal sources say Facebook is mulling a ban on political ads that target small audiences (aka microtargeted ads) -- a common tactic for those spreading false claims. It would bump the minimum target size for a political ad from 100 people to a "few thousand," according to the tipsters. While it's not clear how close Facebook is to shifting its policy, the social network has reportedly asked large Democrat and Republican ad buyers for input on that minimum and "other ideas."

A spokesman didn't confirm or deny the claims, but did reiterate to the WSJ that Facebook was "looking at different ways [it] might refine" its stance on political ads.

If the approach sounds familiar, it should. Google recently limited political ad targeting to age, gender and general location, making it difficult to manipulate specific audiences. Twitter also restricted issue ads by excluding important criteria and banning certain keywords. Facebook would really be following suit, although the approach as described would allow more narrowly targeted ads than others.

There's certainly pressure to take action. The 2020 US presidential election is less than a year away, and there are concerns that hostile governments and unscrupulous politicians might use highly targeted ads to push fake claims and sway votes in important regions. A Facebook ban wouldn't completely halt this practice, but it might discourage the kind of behavior seen in 2016.